Abstract

Producing accurate crop maps during the current growing season is essential for effective agricultural monitoring. Substantial efforts have been made to study regional crop distribution from year to year, but less attention is paid to the dynamics of composition and spatial extent of crops within a season. Understanding how crops are distributed at the early developing stages allows for the timely adjustment of crop planting structure as well as agricultural decision making and management. To address this knowledge gap, this study presents an approach integrating object-based image analysis with random forest (RF) for mapping in-season crop types based on multi-temporal GaoFen satellite data with a spatial resolution of 16 meters. A multiresolution local variance strategy was used to create crop objects, and then object-based spectral/textural features and vegetation indices were extracted from those objects. The RF classifier was employed to identify different crop types at four crop growth seasons by integrating available features. The crop classification performance of different seasons was assessed by calculating F-score values. Results show that crop maps derived using seasonal features achieved an overall accuracy of more than 87%. Compared to the use of spectral features, a feature combination of in-season textures and multi-temporal spectral and vegetation indices performs best when classifying crop types. Spectral and temporal information is more important than texture features for crop mapping. However, texture can be essential information when there is insufficient spectral and temporal information (e.g., crop identification in the early spring). These results indicate that an object-based image analysis combined with random forest has considerable potential for in-season crop mapping using high spatial resolution imagery.

Highlights

  • The timely availability of the spatial distribution of crop types is required for statistical and economic purposes as well as agrarian policy actions related to subsidy payments or implementation of agro-environmental measurements [1,2]

  • After visual comparison between before- and after-segmentation images, we found these scales reflect three levels of image objects of GF-1 WFV at 16 m spatial resolution in agriculturally dominated regions: (1) crop fields with a clear boundary at scale parameter of 30, (2) blocks of artificial surface corresponding to the Figure 4 shows the potentially optimal segmentations scales for different land cover types were 30, 60 and 90, where the local variances changed abruptly

  • After visua1l0 of 19 comparison between before- and after-segmentation images, we found these scales reflect three levels of image objects of GF-1 WFV at 16 m spatial resolution in agriculturally dominated regions: (1) crop scale fpiealrdasmweittheraocfle6a0r,baonudnd(3ar)ythaet sbcraoleapdaersatmlaentedr ocof v30e,r(2c)labslsoecsks(eo.fga.,rtfiofirceiaslt)suarsfadceepciocrtreedspboyndthinegirtroough and uthneevsceanletepxatruamreetoefr corfo6w0,danstdru(3c)tuthree,bcrooarrdeesspt olannddincogvteor cslcaaslseesp(aer.ga.m, feotreersto) fas90d.epTihcteerdefboyreth, e3i0r was deemwreodausgadhsetaehnmedeoudpntaeismvtehanel tsoeexpgttumimreeanoltfsaectgrioomwnednsctsaattlrieuocnfotusrcrcaerl,eocpofortrryecpsrpeoo,pnwtdyhipnicegh, twowhsaiccsahleexwppaaesrcaetmxepdeettecortepodfrot9od0.puTrcohedehureicgfeohrh-eai,gc3hc0-uracy crop macacuprsa.cy crop maps

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The timely availability of the spatial distribution of crop types is required for statistical and economic purposes as well as agrarian policy actions related to subsidy payments or implementation of agro-environmental measurements [1,2]. Understanding the dynamic progress of the composition and spatial structure of mosaicking crops is critical for a diversity of agricultural monitoring activities (e.g., crop acreage estimation, yield modeling, harvest operations schedules and greenhouse gas mitigation) [3,4,5]. There has been an increasing demand for delivering information on the spatial distribution and dynamics of different crop types as early as possible, as in-season the crop maps are curtailed when taken as input to crop area forecasting, hazard prediction, or water use calculations [6]. Since traditional agricultural statistics on crop acreages are usually provided by the end of the season or later, in-season agricultural production managers lack necessary information about the current year’s crops [9,10]. Remote sensing satellites, owing to their synoptic and repetitive nature, have proven to be an effective means for mapping and monitoring crop extent [11,12,13]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call