Inquiry on a Science-Religion Construct: Science-Religion Humankind Space

Abstract

Continuing previous years (2004-2009) tension to follow consecrated methods, and to elicit other specific multi/inter/trans-disciplinary methods (and ways) in order to contribute to contemporary Science-Religion Dialogue, this study tries to report and to add original contribution related to some prominent European (including Romanian) personalities involved into (resulting beyond contemporary focalization) Science and Religion dual inquiries. Thus resulting a(n original) construct: Science-Religion Humankind Space. The members of a real (re)act according to their biological and technical spheres, to their aggregation, to their profoundness. So, a is an implicit processor versus relative sub-processors dealing with revisited information-decision-action-renewed-information cycles. These cycles interfere with Science-Religion-Arts-Philosophy-Management flow(s), presenting subtle connection(s): awareness-insight-action. The scientific, artistic and religious approaches upon transit: societal processor sub-processors may be a multi/inter/trans-disciplinary one. This study proposes and generates a specific focalization upon track of knowledge and information inside gap between deep reality and our reflection, involving: societal knowledge desire as a holistic aim of our mind(s); potential artistic and religious aggregated attitude(s) as profoundness levels of our consciousness; a revised probabilistic toward a dual fuzzy approach upon Universal Consciousness and Evil terms and their necessary connectionist corpus. Humankind development is stepped by within our revealing/revising models. So, according to N desired features of an entity, responsive to our Qualia, previous probabilistic/statistic/stochastic models of entity society (containing some paradoxes) may be revised versus a new interdisciplinary approach within fuzziness, and a new transdisciplinary approach within subtleness (onto its N-1/N ratio which would converge to 1). Is this ratio an internalised pattern within a Science-Religion Humankind Space? Into this context, this study aims to demonstrate that paradoxes and belong to different (multi-disciplinary, today) domains (Logic and Cognitive Science), but staying connected on a (hypothetical) real background and dually on subtle background of individual and communitary reflection. The main hypothesis is that counsciousness evolve as a reflection of reflection (according to above slightly introduction to dual backgrounds, and (potentially) would elicit some impressive turning points toward between science, art and religion, within their natural and artificial bases of neuro, psycho, and social levels of reality. All these dreaming (within an universal versus cosmic tension) toward the (hypothetical) Real trying to step toward huge Reality.The (re)search tries to aggregate results from three domains: (1) dialogue between texts of Saint Basil Great, Saint Maxim Confessor, Pascal - Godel, Heisenberg, Schrodinger; (2) Qualia - Paradoxes expected to be revised within Romanian wooden Triads (Troitze), glass icons from Transylvania area; (3) Qualia - Paradoxes correspondence within sacred and profane sites from Dobrudja, Buzau and Transylvania areas. All these in order to complete a Science-Religion Humankind Space - beyond and inside Godel’s tension on completeness and consistence (as a forever Humankind conflict/consensus).This study tends to aggregate by juxtaposition “traces” and “light/shadow conflict/consensus” from: Saint Spiridon (270-350) ; Saint Basil Great (329-379); Saint Maxim Confessor (580-662); Blaise Pascal (1623-1662); Kurt Godel (1906-1978); Albert Einstein (1879-1955); Erwin Schrodinger (1887-1961); Werner Heisenberg (1901-1976); Mihai Eminescu (1850-1889); Lucian Blaga (1895-1961); Academician, Father Dumitru Staniloaie; Father Constantin Galeriu; Father Arsenie Boca; Academician Romulus Vulcanescu (1912-1999); Romanian Peasantry and ancestors onto three millennia.Partially to all these “traces” and “light/shadow conflict/consensus,” there is prospect to (re)present original contributions of following Romanian personalities: Alexandru De Mocsonyi, Sofronie Vulpescu (Arhiereu Sofronie Craioveanu), Romulus Vulcanescu. There are original documents which present some of their remarkable awareness and insight on for ever Science and Religion dual inquiries.