Input-related demands: vocoded sentences evoke different pupillometrics and subjective listening effort than sentences in speech-shaped noise

Abstract

Objectives The Framework for Effortful Listening (FUEL) suggests five input-related demands can alter listening effort: source, transmission, listener, message and context factors. We hypothesised that vocoded sentences represented a source factor degradation and sentences in speech-shaped noise represented a transmission factor degradation. We used pupillometry and a subjective scale to examine our hypothesis. Design Participants listened to vocoded sentences and sentences in speech-shaped noise at several difficulty levels designed to produce similar word recognition abilities; they also listened to unprocessed sentences. Within-participant pupillometrics and subjective listening effort were analysed. Post-hoc analyses were performed to examine if word recognition accuracy differentially influenced pupil responses. Study samples Twenty young adults with normal hearing. Results Baseline pupil diameter was significantly smaller, peak pupil dilation was significantly larger, peak pupil dilation latency was significantly shorter, and subjective listening effort was significantly greater for the vocoded sentences than the sentences-in-noise. Word recognition ability also affected pupillometrics, but only for the vocoded sentences. Conclusions Our findings suggest that source factor degradations result in greater listening effort than transmission factor degradations. Future research should address how clinical interventions tailored towards different input-related demands may lead to reduced listening effort and improve patient outcomes.