Abstract

255 Background: Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is an oncologic emergency which can be associated with poor outcomes for cancer patients. Our aim was to study the differences in outcomes of MESCC in patients with gastric cancer (GC-MESCC) compared to those with other solid malignancies. Methods: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2016-2020) was queried to identify all solid (breast, prostate, lung, gastrointestinal, renal and thyroid) cancer patients admitted with spinal cord compression. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate differences in socio-demographics, medical comorbidities and outcomes between MESCC in gastric cancer patients and those with other solid cancers. The primary outcome included inpatient mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charges (THC). Results: 78,385 patients with the above solid cancers were admitted for spinal cord compression. Among them, 710 had gastric cancer. Patients with gastric cancer were younger (Mean age: 59.1 vs 66.3 years, p < 0.001). They had higher prevalence of anemia (56 vs 41%), protein energy malnutrition (28.9 vs 18.9%, p < 0.001), and lower prevalence of COPD (8.45 vs 18.5%, p =0.003), smoking (22.5 vs 33.6%, p =0.007) and CKD (9.4 vs 12.3%, p =0.03). On multivariate regression, those with GC-MESCC had two-fold higher odds of all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.0; 95% CI: 1.05-3.96, p = 0.034). On subgroup analysis, mortality was about four times higher for females with GC-MESCC relative to the other group (aOR = 3.8, 95% CI: 1.69-8.52, p = 0.001). There was a trend towards increased LOS (8.9 vs 7.8 days) and THC ($115, 805 vs $96, 074) but it was not statistically significant. Compared with the other cohort, GC-MESCC patients had higher rates of blood transfusion (16.2 vs 9%, p = 0.003). Conclusions: Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression is associated with increased odds of inpatient mortality in gastric cancer patients compared to those with other solid malignancies. Hence, these patients ought to have urgent intervention and close monitoring to prevent adverse outcomes. [Table: see text]

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call