Innovative trends in application spelling norms in justice

Abstract

Problem setting. Trends in the introduction of new spelling rules in justice are related to a number of issues. One of the main problems is the professional training of lawyers, their language competence, readiness to accept new prescriptions. The legal literature has not yet formed a single view on the use of language norms in justice, so it is necessary to introduce into legal practice precisely those verbal constructions that are specifically Ukrainian, would be common to all speakers. Analysis of scientific research. Problems of formation and development of Ukrainian spelling, terminology of gender linguistics, introduction of norms of modern literary language, aspects of feminine innovations were studied by V. Nimchuk, O. Chueshkova, V. Danilchuk, A. Arkhangelska and others. Target of research. Research of the problem of introduction of new orthographic norms into the justice system, sphere of interpersonal communication, determination of tendencies of introduction of feminists into oral and written speech, regularities of use of these words, characteristic of the conducted interrogation on realization of orthographic innovations in legal practice. Article’s main body. The spelling rules are a system of generally accepted rules of the Ukrainian language, which determine the ways of transmitting speech in writing were found. The perfection of spelling at all its levels reflects the current state of Ukrainian legislation, allows you to accurately reflect changes in public life. Language as a way of expressing a person’s worldview is able to change his consciousness, to adapt to their forms and patterns. The more accurate and rich the language, the more complete, as close as possible to reality, the language of justice will be. It is important to introduce new spelling rules in the legal sphere, the use of femininities (the use of words in the feminine gender) to restore gender and linguistic equality. The survey showed that men are more inclined to use femininities (25% answered “yes” and 43.7% – sometimes), while women are less interested in it (only 8.7% answered “yes” and 67.4% – sometimes). Regarding the negative attitude, men and women were in the range of 30% with a slight positive shift in the perception of women. The level of use of femininities by both men and women, as well as in all age groups, is low, in the largest group of people aged 30 to 50 the share of responses to the use of femininities “sometimes” is almost 70%, indicating the lack of interest of lawyers to use this language norm. Conclusions and prospects for development. Linguistic innovations make it possible to respond correctly to changes in modern linguistic and written practice, to determine the rules of writing new borrowed words and proper names, to unify spelling rules. This significantly improves the linguistic perfection of the judiciary.