Abstract

The access to common-pool resources, i.e. to resources in limited common property, are legally distributed in a far more diverse way than limited private property resources. In transportation, a critical case for common-pool resources appear in Green Transport Corridors (GTC), that has been coined by European Union as being «sustainable logistics solutions for cargo transportation’ with a shared pool of resources aiming for multimodal trans-shipment routes with a concentration of freight traffic between significant hubs». Although there are already existing implementations of GTC concepts, there are still a lot of open questions concerning GTC governance and ownership models hindering easy marketing of the GTC approach. This paper discusses how and to which extent smart contracts in combination with blockchain technology as innovative solutions are able to facilitate GTC governance and how smart contracts can be applied to provide legal certainty by managing and allocating distributed access to common-pool resources. Smart contracts can be considered as computerised transaction protocols for the execution of underlying legal contracts, and they do not only target reducing transaction costs by realising trackable and irreversible transactions through blockchain technology for distributed databases, but also show high potential to strengthen cooperative business structures and to facilitate the entrepreneurial collaboration of cross-organisational business processes. From a legal perspective, it is controversial whether the use of smart contracts to distribute access to resources in terms of both general common-pool resources. GTCs implies an added value automatically for legal certainty and fair balance among different forms and degrees of access granted to different members of the cooperative. In cases of incorrect performance, change of circumstances or unduly induced contracts smart contracts fall considerably short on the protection of weaker parties, which the paper illustrates at the example of GTCs to be a decisive detriment of the cooperative members. The paper analyses these potentials and risks of smart contracts for the case of GTCs and showcases from both business and legal perspective in terms of their potential as viable means of distributing access to common-pool resources comprising infrastructure. Keywords common-pool resources, cooperative governance, blockchain, smart contracts, Green Transport Corridors.

Highlights

  • In the year 2009, the Nobel Prize Committee awarded the in the prize of Economic Sciences to Elinor Claire Ostrom for her investigations about the «analysis of economic governance, especially the commons», in which she analysed a variety of communities around the world in how they manage shared pool finite resources of natural and human-made origin

  • The issue has been approached by the EU from an entirely different angle as far as the ecofriendly management of limited common-pool resources in terms of transport infrastructure is concerned: reacting initially mainly to the estimated growth of passenger and freight transport in the European Union, the European Commission presented between 2001 and 2011 a serious of White Papers setting a political framework for the EU transport policy development for the decades. (COM 2007, 2011) A common aim of all White Papers on transport was the necessity to shift significant cargo volumes away from the dominant road traffic to greener transport modes, i.e. trying to implement more environmentally friendly and safer transport by reducing accidents, congestions and pollution

  • The research is subdivided into three parts: The first part provides the theoretical background of governance models of common-pool resources at the example of Green Transport Corridors (GTC) as well as for Smart Contracts and their relationship with cooperatives

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the year 2009, the Nobel Prize Committee awarded the in the prize of Economic Sciences to Elinor Claire Ostrom for her investigations about the «analysis of economic governance, especially the commons», in which she analysed a variety of communities around the world in how they manage shared pool finite resources (common property resources) of natural and human-made origin. She pointed out that private property is not the only concept of protecting finite resources from ruin or depletion, and she documented how communities devise ways to govern sustainable commons for generations.

Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.