Abstract

Innovation is widely considered one of the most important drivers for firm growth in the contemporary economy. However, the ‘elusive’ as well as heterogeneous nature of innovation has generated a lively debate among scholars with regards to the best metrics to capture its features and effects. Often, this has led to a reliance on R&D and/or patent-related measures. We contribute to this debate by pushing forward the idea that a positive effect of investing in intangibles like patents can’t be taken for granted, since it is significantly influenced by the way a firm’s portfolio of patents is created, assembled, and renewed over time. Starting from a sample of 6677 observations derived from a sample of listed European companies with patents and intangibles booked in their financial statements, this study sheds a new light on how a company creates, composes, and renews over time their portfolio of intangibles, with specific attention on patents. In particular, this contribution discusses the different effects that emerge by making a distinction among different forms of patents, considering two dimensions: broadening vs. deepening investments, and application-specific vs. general purpose investments. We notice that as a company increases investments in intangibles and simultaneously enlarges the breadth of their range of activities, its growth becomes particularly remarkable.

Highlights

  • Innovation is widely considered one of the most important drivers for firm growth in the contemporary economy [1,2,3]

  • We investigate the effects of patents development on firm performance as intangibles assets that are written in firms’ books on the basis of effective requirements derived from IAS 38 and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 3

  • This study sheds a new light on how a company creates, composes, and renews over time their portfolio of intangibles, with specific attention on patents

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Innovation is widely considered one of the most important drivers for firm growth in the contemporary economy [1,2,3]. The ‘elusive’ as well as heterogeneous nature of innovation has generated a lively debate among scholars with regards to the best metrics to capture its features and effects Often, this has led to a reliance on R&D (research and development expenses) and/or patent-related measures [2,4,5,6]. Our work offers a significant contribution in establishing a bridge between strategic management studies (especially those exploring dynamic capabilities) and adoption of accounting metrics (such as written intangible assets). The latter are becoming more and more relevant in giving scholars a better picture of intangible resources.

Theoretical Framework
The Management of a Diversified Portfolio of Patents
The Interplay among Patents Portfolio and Intangible Decay
Variables
Control Variables
Findings
Discussion and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call