Abstract
It’s a great privilege to deliver this year’s Susan Campbell Oration. I, like many others, had the pleasure of working with Sue on a range of activities. In 2007, Sue conducted a review of the La Trobe Law School Clinical program which was instrumental in helping ensure the program remained an integral aspect of the La Trobe University law course. I hope what I have to say honours Sue’s memory and her contributions to legal education and clinical legal education in particular2. My focus in this presentation is on how Australian clinical legal education responds to the various innovations and disruptions occurring in the legal arena. The scope and breadth of innovations is mindboggling. There are many predictions about what the future holds for the legal profession, from gloom and doom to utopia, and there is a growing body of literature discussing the implications for the legal profession and legal education. In reality, it is impossible to envisage what the legal world will look like in ten years let alone thirty and that poses a real challenge for those involved in legal education, including clinical legal education. How best to prepare today’s students for the unknown future? Given that I have no expertise in digital technology and am certainly not a futurologist my comments relate to those areas about which I have some background: access to justice, social security and clinical legal education. I briefly outline the variety and scope of innovations occurring in the legal world, discuss two related aspects namely access to justice and government decision making, using the example of Robodebt, and then examine the potential for clinical legal education in these disruptive times. I argue that clinical legal education is well placed to take a more central role in Australian law schools and the training of 21st century legal workers.
Highlights
It’s a great privilege to deliver this year’s Susan Campbell Oration
My focus in this presentation is on how Australian clinical legal education responds to the various innovations and disruptions occurring in the legal arena
How best to prepare today’s students for the unknown future? Given that I have no expertise in digital technology and am certainly not a futurologist my comments relate to those areas about which I have some background: access to justice, social security and clinical legal education
Summary
It’s a great privilege to deliver this year’s Susan Campbell Oration. I, like many others, had the pleasure of working with Sue on a range of activities. Innovations in technology, changes to the way legal services are delivered, the growth of virtual legal practice and a wide range of internet-based information and services present many exciting opportunities to enhance access to justice for those currently denied it.[36] Australian legal aid commissions and community legal centres are eager to explore these options and have been doing so since 1990s37. The technology provides users with templates highlighting parenting agreements that have worked for other couples and artificial Intelligence software can assess previous family law court decisions to show couples how judges generally treat disputes that are similar to theirs.[39] Another example is the development of an online Legal Health Check devised by QPILCH but readily available on National Association of CLCs website. Technological innovations like Robo-debt need to be rigorously scrutinised to ensure that all people but the disadvantaged and marginalised are not further prejudiced.[58]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
