Abstract

Observations have revealed that super-Earths (planets up to 10 Earth masses) are the most abundant type of planets in the inner systems. Their formation is strongly linked to the structure of the protoplanetary disc, which determines growth and migration. In the pebble accretion scenario, planets grow to the pebble isolation mass, at which the planet carves a small gap in the gas disc halting the pebble flux and thus its growth. The pebble isolation mass scales with the disc’s aspect ratio, which directly depends on the heating source of the protoplanetary disc. I compare the growth of super-Earths in viscously heated discs, where viscous heating dissipates within the first million years, and discs purely heated by the central star with super-Earth observations from the Kepler mission. This allows two formation pathways of super-Earths to be distinguished in the inner systems within this framework. Planets growing within 1 Myr in the viscously heated inner disc reach pebble isolation masses that correspond directly to the inferred masses of the Kepler observations for systems that feature planets in resonance or not in resonance. However, to explain the period ratio distribution of Kepler planets – where most Kepler planet pairs are not in mean motion resonance configurations – a fraction of these resonant chains has to be broken. In case the planets are born early in a viscously heated disc, these resonant chains thus have to be broken without planetary mergers, for example through the magnetic rebound effect, and the final system architecture should feature low mutual inclinations. If super-Earths form either late or in purely passive discs, the pebble isolation mass is too small (around 2–3 Earth masses) to explain the Kepler observations, implying that planetary mergers have to play a significant role in determining the final system architecture. Resonant planetary systems thus have to experience mergers already during the gas disc phase, so the planets can get trapped in resonance after reaching 5–10 Earth masses. In case instabilities are dominating the system architecture, the systems should not be flat, but feature mutually inclined orbits. This implies that future observations of planetary systems with radial velocities (RV) and transits (for example through the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) and its follow up RV surveys) could distinguish between these two formation channels of super-Earth and thus constrain planet formation theories.

Highlights

  • Recent observations have revealed that close-in super-Earths are very abundant and even more than 50% of all stars could host super-Earths (Mayor et al 2011; Mulders et al 2018; Zhu & Wu 2018)

  • Summary By comparing the masses of observed planets with the pebble isolation mass in viscously heated discs and discs solely heated by their central star, I identified two formation channels for the formation of rocky close-in super-Earths via pebble accretion

  • In the pebble accretion scenario, the growth of the planet is stopped at the pebble isolation mass (Eq (1)), which is when the planet opens a partial gap in the protoplanetary disc structure stopping the inward flow of pebbles

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent observations have revealed that close-in super-Earths are very abundant and even more than 50% of all stars could host super-Earths (Mayor et al 2011; Mulders et al 2018; Zhu & Wu 2018). Another mechanism to form close-in super-Earth planets is by the accretion of pebbles (Johansen & Lacerda 2010; Ormel & Klahr 2010; Lambrechts & Johansen 2012) In this scenario a high initial local density of solids is not needed, because the small millimeter-centimeter-sized pebbles drift through the disc (Weidenschilling 1977; Brauer et al 2008) from far out and can be accreted by planetary embryos in the inner disc. The consequence of the pebble isolation mass is that the final planetary mass in the pebble accretion scenario is set by the disc structure and does not scale with the initial distribution of solids in the disc as long as planetery mergers do not contribute to the final planetary mass This idea is supported by the recent analysis of the planetary masses of the Kepler observations which has lead to the speculation that planets grow to the thermal mass of the protoplanetary disc (Wu 2019). The passive disc profile used here follows for H/r the scaling relations

Bitsch
Formation of inner super-Earths
Findings
Two formation channels of super-Earth growth in the inner system
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call