Abstract

Pollinator preferences for phenotypic characters, including floral orientation, can affect plant reproductive success. For example, hawkmoths and syrphid flies prefer upward- over downward-facing flowers in field experiments. Although such preferences suggest a cost of pendent flowers in terms of pollinator attraction, we cannot rule out the possibility that the preferences have been affected by prior experience: pollinators might choose the same type of flowers to which they have already become accustomed. To test for innate preference, we observed bumble bees foraging on an array of upward- and downward-facing artificial flowers. Without any prior experience with vertical flowers, 91.7% bees chose an upward-facing flower at the very first visit. In addition to this innate preference, we also found that the preference was strengthened by experience, which suggests that the bees learned upward-facing flowers were easier to handle. Although bumble bees may concentrate on pendent flowers in the field, such learned preferences are evidently imposed on a template of upward-facing preference. Because bee-pollinated pendent flowers face particular difficulties in attracting visits, therefore, we expect them to compensate through other means, such as greater floral rewards.

Highlights

  • In animal-pollinated plants, the number of pollinator visits to a flower is an important determinant of reproductive success because more visits usually mean more pollen transfer (Galen & Stanton 1989; Wilson & Thomson 1991; Jones & Reithel 2001; Engel & Irwin 2003)

  • Manipulation of flower orientation has revealed hawkmoths' preference for upward- over downward-facing flowers of Aquilegia pubescens (Fulton & Hodges 1999), and syrphid flies' preference for upward-facing or horizontal flowers over downward-facing flowers of Commelina communis (Ushimaru & Hyodo 2005, Ushimaru et al 2009). These findings suggest that a pendent orientation will intrinsically make a negative contribution to pollinator attraction, all else being equal

  • We address two questions: 1) do Bombus impatiens workers show any preference for upward- or downward-facing flowers?; and 2) is the preference innate, or learned? we discuss the costs and benefits of pendent flowers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In animal-pollinated plants, the number of pollinator visits to a flower is an important determinant of reproductive success because more visits usually mean more pollen transfer (Galen & Stanton 1989; Wilson & Thomson 1991; Jones & Reithel 2001; Engel & Irwin 2003). Many studies on floral traits affecting pollinator visitation have revealed pollinator preferences, for example for larger flowers (Galen & Newport 1987; Johnson et al 1995; Conner & Rush 1996; Morinaga & Sakai 2006), greater rewards (Pleasants 1981; Thomson 1988; Cartar 2004; Makino & Sakai 2007), and certain colours (Lunau & Maier 1995; Kelber 1997; Weiss 1997; Gumbert 2000), offering insight into the adaptive significance of various floral traits. Manipulation of flower orientation has revealed hawkmoths' preference for upward- over downward-facing flowers of Aquilegia pubescens (Fulton & Hodges 1999), and syrphid flies' preference for upward-facing or horizontal flowers over downward-facing flowers of Commelina communis (Ushimaru & Hyodo 2005, Ushimaru et al 2009) These findings suggest that a pendent orientation will intrinsically make a negative contribution to pollinator attraction, all else being equal.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.