INKONSISTENSI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP KEBERADAAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI SEBAGAI LEMBAGA NEGARA INDEPENDEN

Theresa Yolanda Sirait,Janpatar Simamora,Leonardo David Simatupang,Bintang Me Naibaho

doi:10.51622/njlo.v1i01.35

Theresa Yolanda Sirait, Janpatar Simamora + Show 2 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v1i01.35

Copy DOI

Abstract

The Constitutional Court as mandated in the constitution has a function as a guardian of the constitution, therefore, if there are norms in the Act that against to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia can be done by a trial. The decision of the Constitutional Court in the trial of the Act is related to the formal and material aspects, then the verdict that has been fulfilled the legal considerations by the judge, it will become the basis of a decision. Therefore, the verdict can not revoked arbitrarily unless in making decision due to coercion or negligence. The thesis deals and focuses on two aspects: First, showing and analyzing the considerations of the Constitutional Court in deciding the case No.012-016-019 / PUU-IV / 2006, No.19 / PUU-V / 2017, No.37-39 / PUU-VIII / 2010, No.5 / PUU-IX / 2011, No.36 / PUU-XV / 2017. Second, explains why the Constitutional Court inconsistency in determining the status and legal position of the KPK (Corruption Eradication Commision) through its verdict. From the new latest verdict of the Constitutional Court said that the KPK is an independent state institution under the executive authority , it is different from the previous four Constitutional Court decisions which said KPK as an independent state institution.

Highlights

The Constitutional Court as mandated in the constitution has a function as a guardian of the constitution, if there are norms in the Act that against to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia can be done by a trial
From the new latest verdict of the Constitutional Court said that the KPK is an independent state institution under the executive authority, it is different from the previous four Constitutional Court decisions which said KPK as an independent state institution
Janpatar., Problematika Penyelesaian Sangketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum FH UGM Yogyakarta, Volume 28, Nomor 1, Februari 2016

Summary

Pendahuluan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia 1945, sebagai konstitusi tertulis di Indonesia dan juga merupakan refleksi dari cita-cita hukum bangsa Indonesia, secara eksplisit telah menggariskan beberapa prinsip dasar. Janpatar Simamora mengemukakan bahwa The Constitutional Court of Indonesia has 4 constitutional authorities, namely conducting a judicial review process of the law against the Constitution, resolving cases of authority dispute of state institutions whose authority comes from the constitution, decides the case of dissolution of political parties and decides on disputes over election results and has one the obligation is to decide on an impeachment case.[9] Kewenangan pertama Mahkamah Konstitusi sering disebut sebagai “Constitutional review” merupakan perkembangan gagasan modern tentang sistem pemerintahan yang demokratis yang didasarkan atas ide Negara Hukum (rule of law), prinsip pemisahan kekuasaan (sepration of power), serta perlindungan hak asasi manusia ( the protection of fundamental right ) dalam Constitutional review tercakup dua tugas pokok, yaitu yang pertama, menjamin berfungsinya sistem demokrasi dalam hubungan peran atau “interplay” antar cabang kekuasaan eksekutif, legislatif dan yudikatif. E-ISSN: 2723-164X p-ISSN: 2722-9858 http://ejournal.uhn.ac.id/index.php/opinion dalam menentukan status dan kedudukan hukum Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi melalui putusannya?

Metode Penelitian

Pembahasan

Kesimpulan