Injury in the aged: Geriatric trauma care at the crossroads.

Abstract

In the 2010 US Census, the number of persons age 65 years and older constituted 13% of the population and is projected to constitute 22% of the population by 2020.1 As the US population ages, there is an increasing volume of GTPs; injury is now the seventh leading cause of death for those age 65 years.2 Geriatric trauma is increasing both in absolute number and as a proportion of annual volume presenting to trauma centers. Based on the National Trauma Data Bank, the proportion of trauma patients aged 65 years or older in Level I and II trauma centers increased from 23% in 2003 to 30% in 2009. This is likely a significant underestimate because most GTPs are treated at lower-level or nontrauma centers.3,4 In Washington State, for example, the annual number of GTPs in the state registry has increased from 4,266 in 2000 to 11,226 in 2012, an increase from 30% to 42% of the total trauma population. Clearly, the management of injury in geriatric patients will continue to be a major challenge for trauma care providers. In his presidential address to the AAST entitled “For the care of the undeserved,” Dr. Robert Mackersie identified the growing population of elderly injured patients as medically underserved in terms of limited trauma center access, age-related treatment biases, and as a result, deprived of many of the recent advances in modern trauma care.5 To specifically address these inequalities, he convened an Ad Hoc Geriatric Committee and charged it, “To advise the AAST regarding the problems, issues, and needs of the geriatric patient.” What follows is the work product of the Committee in responding to President Mackersie’s charge. The initial priority was to survey the membership of the AAST to better understand the current conditions under which hospitalized GTPs are receiving care. The second task of the Committee was to enumerate the major problems associated with the care of GTPs and to suggest potential solutions to the identified problems. While the Committee does not presume infallibility in its pronouncements, the material presented is intended to initiate discussion, stimulate research, and to ultimately result in evidence-based guidelines that will better serve this “underserved” segment of our population.