Abstract

ABSTRACT Three different farming systems for Ontario, Canada were compared from technical and economic standpoints. The conventional system farms relied upon government-prescribed rates of synthetic herbicides for weed management. Reduced-input system farms used crop rotations and tillage systems as partial substitutes for synthetic herbicide inputs. Organic system farms proscribed the use of synthetic herbicide treatments entirely, relying instead on crop choices and sequences, tillage methods, animal manure composting, and other management tools for weed control. All farm types had similar natural resource endowments, but conventional farms were the most specialized and operated the largest land base, while organic farms were the most diversified and smallest. Organic farmers expended the most time, effort and operating capital in controlling weeds, despite the lack of any expenditures on synthetic herbicides. However, organic farmers spent the least on seeds, overall labour and overall machinery operat...

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.