Abstract

In suspected bloodstream infections, accurate blood culture results are critical to timely diagnoses and appropriate antibiotic administration. An Initial Specimen Diversion Device®, Steripath® (Magnolia Medical Technologies, Seattle, WA, USA) was evaluated for efficacy in reducing blood culture contamination at Brooke Army Medical Center (6.8% six-month contamination rate prior to intervention) in a six-month quality improvement project. Blood cultures in the emergency department were collected using either Steripath or the standard method. Blood samples of 20 mL were cultured into an aerobic and anaerobic medium and incubated for five days using an automated microbial detection system immediately after collection. Positive bottles were Gram-stained and plated. Rapid molecular polymerase chain reaction identification was performed on all first positive bottles within a blood culture set for each admission or ED visit. Speciation was deduced during antimicrobial sensitivity testing using the Vitek-2 instrument. Seven out of 1016 (0.69%) contamination events occurred when using Steripath vs 53 out of 800 (6.6%) contamination events when using the standard method. Steripath use was associated with a 90% lower incidence of blood culture contamination vs the standard method. Post study, Steripath use was implemented as standard practice hospital-wide, and a retrospective data analysis attributed a 31.4% decrease in vancomycin days of therapy to Steripath adoption. Using Steripath significantly decreased blood culture contamination events for bacterial bloodstream infections compared to the standard method. Subsequent adoption of Steripath reduced overall vancomycin usage. With widescale implementation Steripath could bolster antibiotic stewardship, mitigating antibiotic resistance caused by unnecessary antibacterial treatments.

Highlights

  • Sepsis and septic shock have hospital mortality rates of 17% and 26%, respectively, and are responsible for more than five million deaths annually [1]

  • A total of 1816 blood samples were collected with 44.1% (800/1816) collected using standard method (SM), and 55.9% (1016/1816) collected using SP

  • SP use was associated with a 90% lower incidence of blood culture contamination vs the standard method (Fisher’s exact test, two-tailed P < 0.0001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sepsis and septic shock have hospital mortality rates of 17% and 26%, respectively, and are responsible for more than five million deaths annually [1]. And accurate diagnosis is critical to improving outcomes, but blood culture contamination occurs relatively frequently, providing falsepositive results [2,3]. Blood culture contamination (BCC) may be pervasive in the emergency department (ED) where working quickly and managing stressors may take priority over the meticulous preparation of the skin necessary for venepuncture [4]. Blood cultures contaminated with skin commensals such as coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) may result in patients receiving unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotics, including vancomycin [5]. One retrospective analysis found that 85% of the time that CoNS was identified in blood cultures the resulting treatment was unnecessary [6]. Unnecessary broadspectrum antibiotic use may cause adverse reactions in the patient, and more broadly, is a contributor to the rise in multidrug-resistant micro-organisms [7e9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call