Abstract

To compare the effectiveness of four different intestinal anastomosis techniques at preventing leakage after enterectomy. Experimental study. Grossly normal jejunal segments (N = 70) from three fresh canine cadavers. Eight-centimeter cooled canine cadaveric jejunal segments were randomly assigned to a control group (six segments) and four treatment groups (16 segments each [two segments/anastomotic construct]): (1) handsewn anastomosis (HSA), (2) barbed suture anastomosis (B-HSA), (3) stapled functional end-to-end anastomosis (SFEEA), and (4) stapled functional end-to-end anastomosis with an oversew (SFEEA-O). Control segments and anastomotic constructs were infused intraluminally to the point of leakage. Initial leak pressures were recorded and compared. Initial leak pressures (median + range) for jejunal control segments, HSA, B-HSA, SFEEA, and SFEEA-O were 331.88 mmHg (range, 315.34-346.64), 35.17 (20.29-56.24), 24.99 (6.08-38.64), 28.77 (18.80-85.09), and 35.92 (12.05-80.71), respectively. No difference was detected between leak pressures of anastomosed segments (P = .35), all of which were more variable and lower than those of intact segments. No difference in initial leak pressures was detected between the four anastomosis techniques tested in cooled canine cadaveric jejunum. All four anastomosis techniques evaluated in this study may be suitable in dogs.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call