Abstract

Stress shielding resulting from a stiffness mismatch between bone and femoral prosthesis stems (leading to bone resorption in the proximal femur) is believed to contribute to failure in total hip arthroplasty. In this study, strains were measured under compressive femoral head loads both in the intact femur and after implanting first a collarless steel stem and then a geometrically identical fiber-reinforced polymer composite stem 64% less stiff. Decreasing stem stiffness would be expected increase load transfer from the stem to the proximal medial femur, decreasing the degree of stress shielding. The authors found that proximal medial bone strains were significantly lower with either the steel or composite stem implanted than in the intact case. However, there were no significant differences in strain patterns between the steel and composite stem cases. This apparent insensitivity to prosthesis stiffness may result from factors related to implant geometry and fit.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call