Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the detrimental effects of interference screw fixation on soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction after 6 weeks and compare them with a cross-pin technique. In an intra-articular model, ovine soft tissue grafts were fixed with two 3.3-mm biodegradable pins or with interference screws. Maximum load, yield load, and stiffness of the femur-graft-tibia complex were evaluated immediately after surgery and 6 weeks postoperatively. For knees with interference screw fixation, strength deteriorated by 81% and stiffness deteriorated by 67%. For knees with double cross-pin fixation, strength deteriorated by 48% and stiffness improved by 52%. These differences were statistically significant. At the time of surgery, all grafts failed by slippage of the graft past the screw or by cross-pin failure. At 6 weeks postoperatively, the grafts of both groups failed at the tibial or femoral tunnel entrance. After 6 weeks, the biomechanical characteristics of grafts that were fixed with cross-pins were superior to those of grafts after interference screw fixation. Because of significantly inferior biomechanical stability after interference screw fixation, a less aggressive program of rehabilitation might be recommended.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
