Abstract

Virus replication efficiency is influenced by two conflicting factors, kinetics of the cellular interferon (IFN) response and induction of an antiviral state versus speed of virus replication and virus-induced inhibition of the IFN response. Disablement of a virus's capacity to circumvent the IFN response enables both basic research and various practical applications. However, such IFN-sensitive viruses can be difficult to grow to high-titer in cells that produce and respond to IFN. The current default option for growing IFN-sensitive viruses is restricted to a limited selection of cell-lines (e.g. Vero cells) that have lost their ability to produce IFN. This study demonstrates that supplementing tissue-culture medium with an IFN inhibitor provides a simple, effective and flexible approach to increase the growth of IFN-sensitive viruses in a cell-line of choice. We report that IFN inhibitors targeting components of the IFN response (TBK1, IKK2, JAK1) significantly increased virus replication. More specifically, the JAK1/2 inhibitor Ruxolitinib enhances the growth of viruses that are sensitive to IFN due to (i) loss of function of the viral IFN antagonist (due to mutation or species-specific constraints) or (ii) mutations/host cell constraints that slow virus spread such that it can be controlled by the IFN response. This was demonstrated for a variety of viruses, including, viruses with disabled IFN antagonists that represent live-attenuated vaccine candidates (Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), Influenza Virus), traditionally attenuated vaccine strains (Measles, Mumps) and a slow-growing wild-type virus (RSV). In conclusion, supplementing tissue culture-medium with an IFN inhibitor to increase the growth of IFN-sensitive viruses in a cell-line of choice represents an approach, which is broadly applicable to research investigating the importance of the IFN response in controlling virus infections and has utility in a number of practical applications including vaccine and oncolytic virus production, virus diagnostics and techniques to isolate newly emerging viruses.

Highlights

  • Virus infection triggers the cellular interferon (IFN) response to produce Type 1 IFN’s alpha and beta (IFNa/b)

  • Viruses used in the study were Bunyamwera wildtype (BUN-WT) and a DNSs derivative (BUNDNSs) [18], Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and DNS1 or DNS2 derivatives [7,19], Influenza (A/PR/8/34) and DNS1 derivative [20], Measles (MeV) Edmonson and Mumps (MuV) Enders vaccine strains (NIBSC), and a VDC derivative of PIV5 (PIV5VDC) [21]

  • We verified the ability of these molecules to inhibit IFN induction or IFN signaling using two A549 reporter cell-lines in which a GFP gene is placed under the control of either the IFN-b promoter (A549/pr(IFN-b).GFP) or an IFN stimulated response element (ISRE) promoter (A549/pr(ISRE).GFP) [16]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Virus infection triggers the cellular interferon (IFN) response to produce Type 1 IFN’s alpha and beta (IFNa/b). The JAK1 inhibitors (Cyt387, AZD1480, Ruxolitinib and Tofacitinib) were tested in the A549/pr(ISRE).GFP reporter cell-line following activation of the IFN signaling pathway using purified IFN (Fig. 1B).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call