Abstract

Endothelial thrombin·thrombomodulin (IIa-TM) complex is capable of activating protein C anticoagulant. In vivo, TM can exist in two forms: one with a chondroitin sulfate (CS) (acidic) and one without (non-acidic). TM binding has been shown to reduce the rate of IIa inhibition by antithrombin (AT) in the presence of unfractionated heparin (UFH), especially when the TM possesses a glycosaminoglycan chain. We have recently developed a covalent antithrombin-heparin (ATH) with high potency for inhibition of IIa bound to surfaces. In the present study we examined the role of the CS chain in the inhibition of IIa-TM complex by the novel anticoagulant, ATH, in comparison to AT + UFH. For this study, discontinuous second order rate constant (k2) inhibition assays of IIa-TM were performed at 37°C. IIa was incubated with TM for 30 min and inhibited using either 20nM AT + varying concentrations (0–6000nM) of UFH or a constant concentration of 10nM ATH. Residual IIa activity was measured at 405nm after stopping the reaction using a solution of polybrene and chromogenic substrate (S-2238). Second order rate constants (mean +/− SEM; n≥5) were calculated from plots of IIa-TM activity vs. time and differences determined using two-sample t-tests. Comparison of the second order rate constants for inhibition of IIa, IIa-TM(−CS), or IIa-TM(+CS) by AT + UFH (2.015 × 108 +/− 7.079 × 106 M−1min−1, 1.633 × 108 +/− 8.922 × 106 M−1min−1, and 5.248 × 107 +/− 5.693 × 106 M−1min−1, respectively) showed that the presence of TM reduced the rate of inhibition (with respect to IIa alone; p=0.012, p<0.001, respectively). Moreover, the presence of a CS on the TM inhibited IIa neutralization to a greater degree than when the CS is absent (p<0.001). Furthermore, ATH was a much faster inhibitor of IIa, IIa-TM(−CS), and TM(+CS) (1.486 × 109 +/− 1.193 × 108 M−1min−1, 1.370 × 109 +/− 1.246 × 108 M−1min−1, and 8.869 × 108 +/− 1.246 × 108 M−1min−1, respectively) compared to AT + UFH (p<0.001). CS removal by chondroitin ABC lyase (ABCase) showed that the rate of IIa-TM(+CS) inhibition significantly increased for both AT + UFH and ATH, while no significant change due to ABCase treatment was found for the rate of inhibition of IIa-TM(−CS) by either AT + UFH or ATH. We speculate that during IIa-TM(+CS) inhibition by ATH, the covalently linked heparin moiety may be able to repel (rotate) the CS chain in order for ATH to interact with the IIa-TM complex. In the case of AT + UFH, lack of permanent UFH linkage to AT may allow the CS to displace the UFH chain from binding both AT and IIa. Steric hindrance by CS chains remains a significant factor since the k2 values were lower for the AT + UFH or ATH reactions with IIa-TM(+CS) compared to those with IIa-TM(−CS). Given the rapid reaction rate with free or bound IIa, ATH significantly limits availability of IIa for coagulant or anticoagulant functions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call