Inhibition of neointima formation in an organ culture of human saphenous vein: A comparison of dual endothelin-converting enzyme/neutral endopeptidase and selective neutral endopeptidase inhibition

Abstract

Purpose: Endothelin-1 (ET-1) has been implicated in a variety of vascular pathologic conditions, although there is considerable controversy as to whether such effects are mediated by the ET-A or ET-B receptor. This study investigated whether inhibition of big ET-1 processing by inhibition of endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE) could, therefore, offer an alternative therapeutic strategy in the prevention of vein graft intimal hyperplasia. Methods: Human saphenous vein (3 equal segments from 10 patients) were maintained in organ culture for 14 days with either 50 μmol/L CGS 26303 (a dual ECE/neutral endopeptidase [NEP] inhibitor), 50 μmol/L CGS 24592 (a selective NEP inhibitor), or vehicle (control). They were then processed for immunostaining and neointimal thickness measurements, and conditioned media was collected for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis. Results: Neointimal thickness in the ECE/NEP-inhibited veins did not differ significantly from that of control segments. However, there was a highly significant augmentation in the NEP-inhibited segments, consistent with an inhibition of ET-1 degradation (median difference, 16.8; 95% CI, –23.5, –10.4; P =.002, Wilcoxon). ECE immunostaining was reduced in the ECE/NEP-inhibited veins, although ET-1 staining was also present. ET-1 expression was intense in the thickened neointimas of NEP-inhibited veins, which also showed significant ECE staining. Elevated levels of big ET-1 were measured in the ECE/NEP-inhibited veins, consistent with reduced ECE activity. However, mature ET-1 was still detectable in these segments. Conclusion: There is a requirement for potent and selective inhibitors of ECE to evaluate fully the potential therapeutic benefits of blocking ET-1 biosynthesis. The use of dual inhibitors complicates the interpretation of results, because the observed response is likely to be a combination of both ECE and NEP inhibition. (J Vasc Surg 2001;34:548-54.)