Abstract

Class I histone deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2 contribute to cell proliferation and are commonly upregulated in urothelial carcinoma. To evaluate whether specific inhibition of these enzymes might serve as an appropriate therapy for urothelial carcinoma, siRNA-mediated knockdown and specific pharmacologic inhibition of HDAC1 and HDAC2 were applied in urothelial carcinoma cell lines (UCC) with distinct HDAC1 and HDAC2 expression profiles. HDACs and response marker proteins were followed by Western blotting and qRT-PCR. Effects of class I HDAC suppression on UCCs were analyzed by viability, colony forming, and caspase-3/7 assays; flow cytometry, senescence and lactate dehydrogenase cytotoxicity assays; and immunofluorescence staining. Whereas single knockdowns of HDAC1 or HDAC2 were impeded by compensatory upregulation of the other isoenzyme, efficient double knockdown of HDAC1 and HDAC2 reduced proliferation by up to 80% and induced apoptosis-like cell death in all UCCs. Clonogenic growth was cell line- and HDAC-dependently reduced, with double knockdown of HDAC1 and HDAC2 being usually most efficient. Class I HDAC-specific inhibitors, especially the more specific HDAC1/2 inhibitors romidepsin and givinostat, significantly reduced proliferation of all UCCs (IC50, 3.36 nmol/L-4.59 μmol/L). Romidepsin and givinostat also significantly inhibited clonogenic growth of UCCs, with minor effects on nontumorigenic controls. Intriguingly, these compounds induced primarily S-phase disturbances and nonapoptotic cell death in UCCs. Thus, although both ways of inhibiting HDAC1/2 share mechanisms and efficaciously inhibit cell proliferation, their modes of action differ substantially. Regardless, combined inhibition of HDAC1/2 appears to represent a promising strategy for urothelial carcinoma therapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(2); 299-312. ©2016 AACR.

Highlights

  • Bladder cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the developed world with about 4,00,000 new diagnosed cases per year and 1,50,000 deaths worldwide [1]

  • Endogenous HDAC1 and HDAC2 expression was downregulated in urothelial carcinoma cell lines (UCC) by transiently transfecting siRNA or irrelevant control siRNA into RT-112, VM-CUB1, and SW-1710 or 639-V and UM-UC-3

  • As gH2A.X can be induced by other forms of DNA damage [31], we investigated whether the gH2A.X foci induced by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors correspond to double-strand breaks (DSB) by double staining for gH2A.X and 53-BP1, another DSB marker. 53BP1 colocalized with defined gH2A.X foci in a subpopulation of VM-CUB1 and UM-UC-3 cells in UM-UC-3 cells more strongly after pan-HDAC inhibition by SAHA than by specific HDAC1/2 inhibition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bladder cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the developed world with about 4,00,000 new diagnosed cases per year and 1,50,000 deaths worldwide [1]. About 90% of bladder cancers are urothelial carcinomas, which can be further classified into muscle-invasive cancers, papillary cancers, and carcinoma in situ with different clinical and molecular characteristics [2, 3]. Integrative analysis of urothelial carcinomas has revealed frequent mutations in chromatin regulator genes, including several affecting histone acetylation [3,4,5]. The Cancer Genome Project has identified genetic alterations of histone deacetylase (HDAC) genes in other cancer entities, these are rare in urothelial carcinoma [6,7,8]. Upregulation of class I HDACs is common [6,7,8].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call