Abstract
Pathological calcifications, especially calcium phosphate microcalcifications (MCs), appear in most early breast cancer lesions, and their formation correlates with more aggressive tumors and a poorer prognosis. Hydroxyapatite (HA) is a key MC component that crystallizes in the tumor microenvironment. It is often associated with malignant breast cancer lesions and can trigger tumorigenesis in vitro. Here, we investigate the impact of additives on HA crystallization and inhibition, and how precancerous breast cells respond to minerals that are deposited in the presence of these additives. We show that nonstoichiometric HA spontaneously crystallizes in a solution simulating the tumor microenvironmental fluids and exhibits lump-like morphology similar to breast cancer MCs. In this system, the effectiveness of poly(aspartic acid) and poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) to inhibit HA is examined as a potential route to improve cancer prognosis. In the presence of additives, the formation of HA lumps is associated with the promotion or only minimal inhibition of mineralization, whereas the formation of amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) lumps is followed by inhibition of mineralization. PAA emerges as a robust HA inhibitor by forming spherical ACP particles. When precancerous breast cells are exposed to various HA and ACP minerals, the most influential factors on cell proliferation are the mineral phase and whether the mineral is in the form of discrete particles or particle aggregates. The tumorigenic effects on cells, ranging from cytotoxicity and suppression of proliferation to triggering of proliferation, can be summarized as HA particles < HA aggregates < ACP particles < ACP aggregates. The cellular response to minerals can be attributed to a combination of factors, including mineral phase, crystallinity, morphology, surface texture, aggregation state, and surface potential. These findings have implications for understanding mineral-cell interactions within the tumor microenvironment and suggest that, in some cases, the byproducts of HA inhibition can contribute to disease progression more than HA itself.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
