Abstract

1508 Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is among the most heritable cancers, with 60% of disease risk genetically determined. However, most of the genetic heritability of CLL remains unexplained. Previously, we identified ATM as the first CLL risk gene. Here, we leverage a deep-learning-based germline variant calling algorithm to explore germline mutational enrichment in DNA repair and cell cycle genes in CLL. Methods: A two-stage case-control analysis was conducted using gene-based mutational enrichment analysis of 50 established cancer predisposition DNA repair and cell cycle genes. In the discovery phase, a total of 285 Spanish patients and 5,608 ancestry-matched controls were evaluated. In the validation stage, an independent cohort of 514 European patients and 27,173 ancestry-matched controls were analyzed. An FDR correction was applied to both datasets and genes with a q-value < 0.2 in both cohorts were considered significant. Results: Our joint analysis of 799 CLL patients from 2 genetically distinct cohorts and 32,781 ancestry-matched cancer-free controls identified ATM and CHEK2 as significantly enriched in both CLL datasets. First, our analysis recaptured the previously reported finding of ATM variant enrichment in CLL patients. Carriers of pathogenic ATM mutations in our cohorts (n = 9 patients, discovery: 1.05%, validation: 1.17%) were 2.8–3.7 times more likely to develop CLL compared to cancer-free individuals (discovery: OR = 2.8, 95%CI = 0.7–9.0, q-value = 0.181; validation: OR = 3.7, 95%CI = 1.6–8.3, q-value = 0.0454). In addition, our analysis identified 21 CLL patients carrying pathogenic CHEK2 alterations (discovery: 1.40%, validation: 3.31%), making CLL patients 4.4-8.0 times more likely to carry such alterations compared to controls (discovery: OR = 8.0, 95%CI = 2.3–27.0, q-value = 0.026; validation: OR = 4.4, 95%CI = 2.5–7.3, q-value < 0.001). Conclusions: Our analysis of genetically distinct CLL cohorts, using a high-sensitivity variant calling algorithm, supports CHEK2 as a potentially novel CLL predisposition gene that may explain a portion of the missing monogenic heritability of CLL. In addition, this study highlights the DNA repair and cell cycle regulation pathways as potential drivers of CLL susceptibility.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.