Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.05% in the Treatment of Anogenital Warts: A Prospective Controlled Trial Comparing It With Topical Podophyllin Solution 25.

Abstract

Anogenital warts (AGWs) are a common therapeutic challenge. All therapies are associated with burning, pain, and frustrating high rate of recurrence. The search for a new alternative continues. Recently, a diterpene ester extracted from the Euphorbia peplus plant (ingenol mebutate [IM]) has been shown to possess activity against AGWs. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of topical 0.05% ingenol gel with another herbal extract medication (topical 25% podophyllin solution) in treatment of AGWs. This was a comparative single blinded nonrandomized, 2-arm trial of ingenol 0.05% gel versus podophyllin solution 25% administered up to 6 times to patients with AGWs. To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy, the complete clearance rate and recurrence rate were assessed 1 and 12 weeks after last treatment, respectively. Safety was assessed by occurrence and severity of pain and local skin reaction (LSR). Of 31 and 36 patients in the IM group and podophyllin group who completed the study, initial complete resolution was observed in 20 (64.5%) and 14 (38.9%) patients, respectively (P = 0.03). The initial clearance was faster in the IM group (2.00 ± 0.91 weeks) compared with the podophyllin group (4.21 ± 1.05 weeks, P = 0.00). After 3 months, recurrence was seen in 13 (65.0%) of 20 patients in the IM group and 6 (42.8%) of 14 in the podophyllin group (P = 0.20). The number of patients with complete resolution after 3 months was not different between the 2 groups (7/31 in the IM group and 8/36 in the podophyllin group, P = 0.97). The mean ± SD severity scores for LSR and pain in the IM group were 6.65 ± 1.76 and 6.13 ± 2.57, respectively, which was significantly higher than their scores (3.39 ± 1.57 and 2.58 ± 1.38) in the podophyllin group (P = 0.00). Ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel is effective as podophyllin 25% solution in treating AGWs, with further benefit of being much more rapid. However, high recurrence rate, sever pain, and LSR limit its use.