Infrequent loss of SMARCA4, SMARCA2, and SMARCB1 expression in uterine mesenchymal tumors

Abstract

SMARCA4-deficient uterine sarcoma (SMARCA4-DUS) was recently proposed as a new entity of uterine sarcoma. Reported cases of SMARCA4-DUS showed the loss of SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 expression. However, the prevalence of their deficiency in uterine mesenchymal tumors remains unclear. This study immunohistochemically examined the expression of SMARCA4, SMARCA2, and SMARCB1 in 206 uterine mesenchymal tumorsand detected a round cell tumor with the loss of SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 and a low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with SMARCA4 deficiency. The remaining 204 cases, including 170 smooth muscle tumors, 22 endometrial stomal nodule/sarcomas, seven undifferentiated uterine sarcomas, two adenosarcomas, one uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord tumor, and two perivascular epithelioid cell tumors, retained the expression of both SMARCA4 and SMARCA2. All tumors retained SMARCB1 expression. The round cell tumor with the loss of SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 was composed of diffuse small round cell growth with follicle-like spaces, which resembled small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type. Immunohistochemically, the tumor showed the proficient expression of mismatch repair proteins and wild-type p53 expression, which favored SMARCA4-DUS; however, the tumor harbored the PIK3CA mutation, andthus, was reclassified as undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma. In conclusion, SMARCA4, SMARCA2, and SMARCB1 were rarely deficient in uterine mesenchymal tumors. SMARCA4 immunohistochemistry has potential in the diagnosis of SMARCA4-DUS with the exclusion of some tumors showing its deficiency, such as endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated carcinoma. Undifferentiated carcinoma may show an indistinguishable morphology and immunophenotype from SMARCA4-DUS, andthus, molecular analysis is required for their distinction in diagnostic practice.