Abstract

To better serve society, infrastructure organizations must manage their civil infrastructure systems effectively and efficiently, employing best practices in infrastructure management and relevant information systems. As information systems mature, communications follow a general trend away from informal human-to-human communications towards computer-to-computer information exchange. For efficient implementation of computer-based exchange of information, these communications must be formally described. As part of a larger study into the formalization of communications within the infrastructure industry, this paper examines the level to which work processes and communications are formalized and designed at present within the domain of infrastructure management. The research adopts a maturity model approach. There are many maturity models available in different industries, but their focus is on the maturity of the way work processes and communication are operated and managed, not the way these work processes and communications are formalized and designed. To address the issue, an Infrastructure Management-Process Maturity Model (IM-PMM) is developed to assess the degree to which work processes and communications are formalized within a specific engineering domain, namely infrastructure management. A five-step approach is used to develop the IM-PMM: define the problem, compare existing maturity models, develop the model, apply the model, and evaluate the maturity model. This paper describes the development and application of the Infrastructure Management-Process Maturity Model (IM-PMM) that can benchmark the current level of maturity of work processes and communications in the domain of infrastructure management. The proposed IM-PMM uses a scale of five levels of maturity (stages) and uses three core elements (i.e. process/transaction map definition, actor/role definition, and information definition) to benchmark existing work processes, plus one additional element (message definition) to benchmark existing communications. The proposed model has been applied and tested in the domain of infrastructure management using a structured interview approach. The resulting data show that existing work processes and communications are typically accomplished in an ad hoc manner, emphasizing the need for further improvements in the way that work processes and communications are defined if infrastructure organizations intend to deploy advanced information systems. The proposed IM-PMM would help the transaction development personnel (including transaction analysts, transaction designers, software developers, process modellers, and industry experts) to assess and benchmark the maturity of the work processes and communications in the domain of infrastructure. As part of the evaluation, the proposed IM-PMM is verified through testing and applying it in the domain of infrastructure management; future work will conduct validation through industry expert review.

Highlights

  • Society’s quality of life and sustainability depends heavily on the quality and sustainability of the public infrastructure, from roads and bridges to electrical grids and water systems, from hospitals and sport facilities to parks and public transit

  • This paper describes the development and application of the Infrastructure Management-Process Maturity Model (IM-PMM) that can benchmark the current level of maturity of work processes and communications in the domain of infrastructure management

  • The five steps are as follows: (i) Define the problem - the problem was first explicitly defined in terms of the needs assessment to develop a new IM-PMM. (ii) Compare existing maturity models - existing maturity models were compared to assess gaps explicitly and to develop strategies for the development of the proposed IM-PMM. (iii) Develop the IM-PMM - the proposed IM-PMM was developed based on the review of the existing maturity models and the strategies developed in step 2. (iv) Apply the IM-PMM - the IM-PMM put into practice and applied in the domain of infrastructure management to test its’ applicability. (v) Evaluate the IM-PMM - this step relates to evaluating the proposed IM-PMM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Society’s quality of life and sustainability depends heavily on the quality and sustainability of the public infrastructure, from roads and bridges to electrical grids and water systems, from hospitals and sport facilities to parks and public transit. The third issue is dealt with exploring and examining the level to which these communications or transactions are formalized in the domain of infrastructure management using a maturity model technique, which is the core focus of this paper. The maturity models are used to quantify and compare management practices for the purpose of benchmarking, determining strengths and areas for improvement, and identifying best practices (Harpham, 2006) They have been in use since 1970 (Gibson & Nolan, 1974) and hundreds of MMs have been developed for information systems (Mettler & Rohner, 2009; Becker & Knackstedt, 2009) and other fields (Curtis & Alden, 2007). This paper describes the development and application of the IM-PMM to assess the level to which work processes and communications are defined in current municipal infrastructure management.

Related Work in Process Maturity Models
Maturity Models Related to Project Management in the Construction Industry
Maturity Models Related to the Software Industry
Comparison and Summary of Maturity Models
11 Hutchinson
Development of the Infrastructure Management Process Maturity Model
The Work Processes and Communications Targets
Maturity Stages
The Work Process and Communication Elements
Application of the Infrastructure Management Process Maturity Model
Planning and Design of the Survey
Target Population
Conducting the Survey
Analysis of Survey Results
Typical Maturity Levels
Comparison of Different Work Processes and Different Communications
The elements being analyzed have no significant difference
Comparison of Different Elements
Work Process Versus Communications
Comparison of Cities Versus Districts
Overall Interpretation
Summary and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call