Infrainguinal Reconstruction in Octogenarians: Should Age Be a Contraindication?

Abstract

With the graying of America comes an increasing demand for medical care of the elderly. Unfortunately, due to a combination of rising costs of health care and driving force from the public to lower spending, health maintenance organizations and insurance companies are less willing to pay for expensive surgical procedures. Recently, infrainguinal arterial reconstructions have been denied at our institution solely on the basis of patient's age, without adequate assessment of data. We evaluated the results of patients aged over 80 years who underwent infrainguinal reconstruction and compared them to results of younger cohorts during the same time period. From 1989 to 1998, 629 octogenarians had infrainguinal reconstructions performed at our institution. In the same time period, 3257 procedures were performed on patients <80 years old. Demographics, indications for operations, and outcomes were compared. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher's exact test and log rank analysis, assuming significance for p < 0.05. Indications for operation were significantly more often limb salvage and less often claudication in the older group. Nonfatal complication rates were similar. Primary and secondary patency rates as well as limb salvage rates were comparable in both groups. Patients who are >80 years of age should expect comparable outcomes to those of their younger cohorts when undergoing infrainguinal reconstructions. Health care dollars can be well spent on octogenarians and age should not be a contraindication for infrainguinal reconstruction.