Abstract

BackgroundEpilepsy, multiple sclerosis (MS), and depression are chronic conditions where technology holds potential in clinical monitoring and self-management. Over 5 years, the Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse - Central Nervous System (RADAR-CNS) consortium has explored the application of remote measurement technology (RMT) to the management and self-management of patients in these clinical areas. The consortium is large and includes clinical and nonclinical researchers as well as a patient advisory board.ObjectiveThis formative development study aimed to understand how consortium members viewed the potential of RMT in epilepsy, MS, and depression.MethodsIn this qualitative survey study, we developed a methodological tool, universal points of care (UPOC), to gather views on the potential use, acceptance, and value of a novel RMT platform across 3 chronic conditions (MS, epilepsy, and depression). UPOC builds upon use case scenario methodology, using expert elicitation and analysis of care pathways to develop scenarios applicable across multiple conditions. After developing scenarios, we elicited views on the potential of RMT in these different scenarios through a survey administered to 28 subject matter experts, consisting of 16 health care practitioners; 5 health care services researchers; and 7 people with lived experience of MS, epilepsy, or depression. Survey results were analyzed thematically and using an existing framework of factors describing links between design and context.ResultsThe survey elicited potential beneficial applications of the RADAR-CNS RMT system as well as patient, clinical, and nonclinical requirements of RMT across the 3 conditions of interest. Potential applications included recognition of early warning signs of relapse from subclinical signals for MS, seizure precipitant signals for epilepsy, and behavior change in depression. RMT was also thought to have the potential to overcome the problem of underreporting, which is especially problematic in epilepsy, and to allow the capture of secondary symptoms that are not generally collected in MS, such as mood.ConclusionsRespondents suggested novel and unanticipated uses of RMT, including the use of RMT to detect emerging side effects of treatment, enable behavior change for sleep regulation and activity, and offer a way to include family and other carers in a care network, which could assist with goal setting. These suggestions, together with others from this and related work, will inform the development of the system for its eventual application in research and clinical practice. The UPOC methodology was effective in directing respondents to consider the value of health care technologies in condition-specific experiences of everyday life and working practice.

Highlights

  • BackgroundPrior work has recognized the need for health information technologies (HITs) to consider socio-technical facets used over time and the varying trajectories experienced within and between health care services [1]

  • We describe the use of a new methodology, based on use case scenarios, to inform the design of the RADAR-central nervous system (CNS) remote measurement technology (RMT) system, which is to be used in research and in clinical practice

  • No portions of the survey were consistently ignored, in response to some questions, participants signposted to earlier responses given, indicating that the answer was applicable to multiple universal points of care (UPOC)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

BackgroundPrior work has recognized the need for health information technologies (HITs) to consider socio-technical facets used over time and the varying trajectories experienced within and between health care services [1]. Through a systems approach to design, the added value of novel technologies can be understood when these advances enable new ways of working, speed up or make existing practices easier, or enhance the user experience [7]. This perspective supports the inclusion of all users within a system and aims to understand the multiple socio-technical interactions of a new intervention, whether they are human-to-human interactions, human-to-technology interactions, or any permutation. The consortium is large and includes clinical and nonclinical researchers as well as a patient advisory board

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call