Abstract

BackgroundWhen germline mutations are suspected as causal in cancer, patient DNA may be sequenced to detect variants in relevant genes. If a particular mutation has not been reported in reliable family studies, genetic counselors are facing a dilemma of appropriately informing patients. Many sequencing facilities provide an interpretation of the findings based on the available sequence databases or on prediction tools that are curated from bioinformatics and mechanistic datasets. The counseling dilemma is exacerbated if the pedigree data are not informative but the in silico predictions suggest pathogenicity.MethodsWe present here a real world example of the c.256G > A CDKN2A variant, which was detected in one melanoma patient where two siblings were diagnosed with melanoma in situ. We investigated a detailed family history of the affected siblings in order to survey probability of the cancer risks within the context to this mutation.ResultsThis c.256G > A CDKN2A variant was detected in one of the brothers and in the melanoma-free mother while the other brother in the family tested negative. The variant had been previously described in one patient from a melanoma family. In the family under investigation, the mother’s 16 first-and second-degree relatives had survived past the median onset age for melanoma and none presented melanoma. We tested the variant using multiple bioinformatic tools that all predicted deleteriousness of the variant. The genetic counseling report to the melanoma patient stated that the CDKN2A variant was ‘likely pathogenic’ and the disease was defined as ‘likely hereditary melanoma’.ConclusionsThe pedigree data showed at the most a low penetrance variant, which, if taken into consideration, might have altered the provided diagnosis. When dealing with ‘practically’ unknown variants the counselors would be advised to incorporate a detailed family history rather than basing predictions on functionality provided by sequencing facilities.

Highlights

  • A study from 2015 concluded: “Clinicians, patients and their relatives would all benefit from an improved level of genetic literacy” [1]

  • P16 and ARF are transcribed from two separate promoters with unique first exons and shared exons 2 and 3 that are translated from alternate reading frames and bear no amino acid homology (Fig. 1)

  • Among the 12 offspring of the 4 sisters none are known to have melanoma but one women died of pancreatic cancer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A study from 2015 concluded: “Clinicians, patients and their relatives would all benefit from an improved level of genetic literacy” [1]. We will illustrate the genetic literacy problem with a real world example from a melanoma family with a CDKN2A mutation c.256G > A. The most common high-risk predisposing gene for cutaneous melanoma (subsequently melanoma) is cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) [7]. The a CDKN2A mutation c.256G > A causes an Ala86Thr amino acid changed in p16 and Cys100Tyr in ARF where the nucleotide change is c.299G > A. Germline mutations may predispose to pancreatic cancer [11]. When germline mutations are suspected as causal in cancer, patient DNA may be sequenced to detect variants in relevant genes. If a particular mutation has not been reported in reliable family studies, genetic counselors are facing a dilemma of appropriately informing patients. The counseling dilemma is exacerbated if the pedigree data are not informative but the in silico predictions suggest pathogenicity

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call