Abstract

Mobile phone usage is growing at an unprecedented rate. The ability to remain connected, the ease of smart phone use and declining mobile costs have allowed this technology to expand at a very high rate globally. The study aimed to quantitatively determine the reasons for inactive practice of security measures of smart-phone usage among college students in the United States. The study also examined the Consideration of Future Consequences (CFC) level in relation to the level of smart-phone security measures, determined the levels of security measures on smart-phone (SP) by users, and establish the relationship between CFC level and the levels of smart-phone security measures among college students. Using a quantitative research survey and simple random sampling procedure, the methodology focused on analyzing data through testing of hypotheses. The t-test, Pearson’s correlation, regression coefficients and their respective p-values. The results showed 69.8% of college students set PIN, password and screen lock on their smart phones while 74.8% were cautious with smart phone applications and 6.2% practiced on setting of security software including rooting services. On the other hand, 35.4% protected their SP data through encryption, 47.4% had data checks and security alert while 46.2% had set Bluetooth applications and 41.4% had used backup storage for sensitive data. Use of Biometrics or other security unknown security adoptions were not included in the study. The study also found that lack of knowledge about technology or applications for SP security, lack of security habits and practices, rigorous involvement of setting SP security details like backups, encryption, security software etc., assumptions that SP are security and tamper-proof as well as lack of training, guidance and after sale services on SP security are significant reasons for lack of security measures practices concerning smart-phone usage by college students.

Highlights

  • Most importantly, is the case of smartphones; from email services to short message texts, voice calls to social media usage, phonebook entries to gallery applications, the smartphone has lots of private and personal information that needs to be secured in all manners possible

  • The research will help in testing the hypotheses on- the reasons behind the lack of practice of security measures of smartphone usage as well as the correlation between Consideration of Future Consequences (CFC) level and the rate of smartphone security measures among college students

  • This section used quantitative analysis to determine the reasons behind the lack of practice of security measures of smartphone (SP) usage as well as examine the Consideration of Future Consequences (CFC) level in correlation to the level of smartphone security measures among college students

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mobile communication technology (MCT) continue to expand and attain unprecedented level of usage due to several feature capabilities such as short messaging (SMS), voice messaging, gaming, social media easy access, and Bluetooth technology integration. Wireless internet access and capabilities such as text messaging, social networking, gaming, and voice messaging are powerful and alluring communication tools. Thomas (2014) describes a smartphone as a type of mobile device or phone gadget that provides wireless communication services including voice calls, short message services, and internet access among other applications. National Institute of Standards and Technology (2010) notes that the smartphones’ wireless internet access and applications such as text messaging, social networking, gaming and voice messaging are powerful and alluring communication tools that have speared most mobile device users to use such technology increasingly. With rising security problems and issues with smartphones, there is a need to increase awareness about risks to personal data and mobile phone security threats. (UNDP, 2016)

Related Work
Methodology
Analysis of Socio-Demographic Factors
Discussion
The Relationship Between Smartphone Security Measures Level and CFC Level
Findings and Conclusions of the Study
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call