Abstract

Predictable forecast errors in survey data documented in the existing literature suggest a deviation from the rational expectations hypothesis and are in favor of imperfect information models such as sticky and noisy information models. This article assesses the validity of the imperfect information models by establishing a linkage between dispersions in survey forecasts and survey forecast revisions. We find that the dynamics of dispersion in survey forecasts are consistent with the prediction of sticky information models, but at odds with that of conventional noisy information models as well as full information rational expectations models, both of which assume agents’ continuous updating of their information sets.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.