Abstract

The need to complete multiple tasks concurrently is a common occurrence both daily life and in occupational activities, which can often include simultaneous cognitive and physical demands. As one example, there is increasing availability of head-worn display technologies that can be employed when a user is mobile (e.g., while walking). This new method of information presentation may, however, introduce risks of adverse outcomes such as a decrement to gait performance. The goal of this study was thus to quantify the effects of a head-worn display (i.e., smart glasses) on motor variability during gait and to compare these effects with those of other common information displays (i.e., smartphone and paper-based system). Twenty participants completed four walking conditions, as a single task and in three dual-task conditions (three information displays). In the dual-task conditions, the information display was used to present several cognitive tasks. Three different measures were used to quantify variability in gait parameters for each walking condition (using the cycle-to-cycle standard deviation, sample entropy, and the “goal-equivalent manifold” approach). Our results indicated that participants used less adaptable gait strategies in dual-task walking using the paper-based system and smartphone conditions compared with single-task walking. Gait performance, however, was less affected during dual-task walking with the smart glasses. We conclude that the risk of an adverse gait event (e.g., a fall) in head-down walking conditions (i.e., the paper-based system and smartphone conditions) were higher than in single-task walking, and that head-worn displays might help reduce the risk of such events during dual-task gait conditions.

Highlights

  • Diverse activities impose simultaneous physical and cognitive demands [1]

  • Simple effects testing indicated that sample entropy (SaEn) (Stride Length) significantly decreased for females in the DT-paper and DT-phone conditions compared to the ST, but that values for the males were similar in all display conditions

  • Our primary goal in this study was to investigate the effects of different types of information display on gait variability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Diverse activities impose simultaneous physical and cognitive demands [1]. Use of a computer [2], and manufacturing tasks [3] are several examples of such dual task activities in the occupational domain. It remains unclear, whether such activities impose higher risks of adverse outcomes, such as injury, as existing evidence is somewhat mixed. Mental loads imposed along with physical demands have been suggested as increasing the risk of injuries through decreased muscle endurance, delayed muscle recovery [4], increased spinal loads [5], and gait variabilities [6]. It appears that different levels of physical and/or mental demands can lead to diverse outcomes [1]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call