Information from primary care: its importance and value. A comparison of information from Slovenia and England and Wales, viewed from the 'Health 21' perspective.

Abstract

The WHO have set health standards in the form of 21 targets--Health 21--and the EU are developing a set of health indicators whereby national health status can be measured. Data from Slovenia and from England and Wales assessing information systems in primary care and their capacity to deliver the requirements of these initiatives have been examined. In both countries, primary care is provided through a state-led service. Consultation data from the annual report of the Department of Health Slovenia (1999) are compared in respect of relevant targets with data from the Fourth National Morbidity Survey (1992) in England and Wales. Consultation rates were standardized to the European Union 15 country population (1998). Consultation rates in females were similar in the two countries whereas in males rates were higher in Slovenia. The proportionate distributions of consultations by chapter of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) were similar in both countries, respiratory (17%) and musculoskeletal (9%) disorders ranked first and second. For eye diseases, injury and poisoning, factors influencing health status (e.g. medical examination). proportions were higher in Slovenia: for mental disorders higher in England and Wales. The relativity of male to female consultation rates was broadly similar with higher rates in females in most ICD chapters. These differences are considered in detail against the background of WHO targets. Data gathered systematically from the surveillance of consultations in primary care are important to the measurement of WHO 'Health 21' targets.