Abstract

Community-based monitoring schemes provide alternatives to costly scientific monitoring projects. While evidence shows that local community inhabitants can consistently measure environmental changes, few studies have examined how learned monitoring skills get passed on within communities. Here, we trained members of indigenous Kichwa communities in the Ecuadorian Amazon to measure fern and dung beetle species richness and examined how well they could pass on the information they had learned to other members of their community. We subsequently compared locally gathered species richness data to estimates gathered by trained biologists. Our results provide further evidence that devolved monitoring protocols can provide similar data to that gathered by scientists. In addition, our results show that local inhabitants can effectively pass on learned information to other community members, which is particularly important for the longevity of community-based monitoring initiatives.

Highlights

  • Community-based monitoring schemes (CBMS) combine local traditional knowledge with existing organizational systems to measure ecological changes [1, 2]

  • While evidence shows that local community inhabitants can consistently measure environmental changes, few studies have examined how learned monitoring skills get passed on within communities

  • We trained members of indigenous Kichwa communities in the Ecuadorian Amazon to measure fern and dung beetle species richness and examined how well they could pass on the information they had learned to other members of their community

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Community-based monitoring schemes (CBMS) combine local traditional knowledge with existing organizational systems to measure ecological changes [1, 2]. With appropriate training, CBMS can provide precise data on environmental processes. Oldekop et al [6] show that community inhabitants in Ecuador can use simple and cost-effective methodologies to provide fern species richness estimates that accurately reflect biodiversity patterns observed by scientists. We do not know whether trained community members can train other people within their communities. This information is important for the creation of long-term and decentralized CBMS, where the majority of the collection and interpretation of data is directly managed by local communities and stakeholders [1, 2]. We compare species richness estimates of two biodiversity indicators, ferns [7] and dung beetles [8] ( beetles), gathered by scientists, community members trained by scientists, and community members trained by the community members originally trained by scientists

Methods
Training
Sampling
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call