Abstract

This article emphasizes the importance of actor networks for the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), and suggests how a network perspective can contribute to our understanding of (global) sustainability governance. Actor networks are often driven by homophily, as actors tend to interact with those similar to them. Yet, not least in a context sustainability governance, heterophily of actor cooperation is claimed to be beneficial. In contrast to homophily, heterophily represents situations where actors cooperate with those that are different, and thus combine diverse sets of knowledge and competences. Based on the case of Swiss actors involved in the implementation of the SDG 6 on water in countries of the global South, we use social network analysis and qualitative interview data to study how homophily and heterophily influence actors' information exchange. According to quantitative network data, information exchange between actors is indeed influenced by homophily regarding the type of actor and the policy forums actors are participating in. Nevertheless, we also find evidence for heterophily, as actors tend to exchange information with actors with different methodological foci. Furthermore, qualitative interview data show that actors perceive heterophilous network ties as beneficial for SDG implementation.

Highlights

  • As a strategy of global sustainability governance, having defined the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) can be considered a process of goal setting (Biermann et al, 2017; Kanie and Biermann, 2017)

  • To identify the information exchange network, we presented the list of actors to each survey respondent and ask the respondent to indicate with which other actor they exchanged information regarding SDG 6

  • Our analysis has focused on important sub-structures within networks related to homophily or heterophily

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As a strategy of global sustainability governance, having defined the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) can be considered a process of goal setting (Biermann et al, 2017; Kanie and Biermann, 2017). Given the broad set of relevant actors for SDG implementation pro­ cesses, and the interactions of these actors, network concepts and methods can make a useful contribution to the debate on (global) sus­ tainability governance. Interactions among many different actors can be considered instances of network governance, where actors jointly work towards policies, strategies, and similar outcomes (Newig et al, 2010). Such a focus on networks among actors is emphasized by SDG 17 that calls for “Strengthen[ing] the means of implementation and revi­ taliz[ing] the global partnership for sustainable development” (UN, 2015). Sharing knowledge and exchanging information in networks is a potential first step for establishing actor cooperation in network governance (Keast et al, 2007; Margerum, 2008)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call