Abstract

The SP theory of intelligence, with its realization in the SP computer model, aims to simplify and integrate observations and concepts across artificial intelligence, mainstream computing, mathematics, and human perception and cognition, with information compression as a unifying theme. This paper describes how abstract structures and processes in the theory may be realized in terms of neurons, their interconnections, and the transmission of signals between neurons. This part of the SP theory—SP-neural—is a tentative and partial model for the representation and processing of knowledge in the brain. Empirical support for the SP theory—outlined in the paper—provides indirect support for SP-neural. In the abstract part of the SP theory (SP-abstract), all kinds of knowledge are represented with patterns, where a pattern is an array of atomic symbols in one or two dimensions. In SP-neural, the concept of a “pattern” is realized as an array of neurons called a pattern assembly, similar to Hebb's concept of a “cell assembly” but with important differences. Central to the processing of information in SP-abstract is information compression via the matching and unification of patterns (ICMUP) and, more specifically, information compression via the powerful concept of multiple alignment, borrowed and adapted from bioinformatics. Processes such as pattern recognition, reasoning and problem solving are achieved via the building of multiple alignments, while unsupervised learning is achieved by creating patterns from sensory information and also by creating patterns from multiple alignments in which there is a partial match between one pattern and another. It is envisaged that, in SP-neural, short-lived neural structures equivalent to multiple alignments will be created via an inter-play of excitatory and inhibitory neural signals. It is also envisaged that unsupervised learning will be achieved by the creation of pattern assemblies from sensory information and from the neural equivalents of multiple alignments, much as in the non-neural SP theory—and significantly different from the “Hebbian” kinds of learning which are widely used in the kinds of artificial neural network that are popular in computer science. The paper discusses several associated issues, with relevant empirical evidence.

Highlights

  • The SP theory of intelligence, and its realization in the SP computer model, is a unique attempt to simplify and integrate observations and concepts across artificial intelligence, mainstream computing, mathematics, and human perception and cognition

  • This paper, which draws on Wolff (2006, chapter 11) with revisions and updates, describes how abstract structures and processes in the SP theory may be realized in terms of neurons, their interconnections, and the transmission of impulses between neurons

  • The SP theory in its abstract form may be evaluated in terms of “simplicity” and “power” of the theory itself, in terms of its potential to promote simplification and integration of structures and functions in natural or artificial systems that conform to the theory (Section 3.8.2 below), and in comparison with other AI-related systems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The SP theory of intelligence, and its realization in the SP computer model, is a unique attempt to simplify and integrate observations and concepts across artificial intelligence, mainstream computing, mathematics, and human perception and cognition. This paper, which draws on Wolff (2006, chapter 11) with revisions and updates, describes how abstract structures and processes in the SP theory may be realized in terms of neurons, their interconnections, and the transmission of impulses between neurons This part of the SP theory—called SP-neural—may be seen as a tentative and partial theory of the representation and processing of knowledge in the brain. SP-abstract is a relatively simple system with descriptive and explanatory power across a wide range of observation and phenomena in artificial intelligence and related areas How can such a system have anything useful to say about the extraordinary complexity of brains and nervous systems, both in their structure and in their workings?.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call