Abstract

This study analyses the information asymmetry at the stock market considering two different types of information flow. The first type represents changes in information where informed traders know if the stock price will increase or decrease. The second type is less specific - the direction is unknown, but informed traders know that the stock price either will increase or decrease. The different flows of information are estimated within a GARCH framework, using shocks in Swedish OMX-index returns and index option strangle returns respectively. The results show significant conditional variance in index returns and options strangle returns, although with notable differences. The index returns exhibit a high level of variance persistence, and an asymmetric initial impact of return shocks to variance (leverage effect). The strangle returns have a relatively low variance persistence, but a higher (and more symmetric) initial impact of return shocks. A time series regression of call and put option bid-ask spreads is performed, relating spreads to these two types of information, as well as other explanatory variables. The results show that option spreads are related to shocks in index and options strangle returns, as well as the conditional variance of the stock returns. Hence, market makers appear to alter option bid-ask spreads primarily in response to unexpected shocks in stock and strangle returns - and to changes in the expected variance level of stock returns.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.