Abstract

This chapter argues that Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a watershed, pioneering the systematic use of performance monitoring and benchmarking as regulatory tools. It examines a series of interlocking and mutually reinforcing explanations of TRI’s operative success. The chapter argues that TRI works by creating a transparent and information-rich environment in which internal and external monitors are better able to evaluate and track performance, demand improvements, and hold managers accountable. It examines some of TRI’s shortcomings and limitations, both those that may be corrigible within the TRI framework, and those that suggest deeper and more general limitations on the use of performance monitoring and benchmarking as regulatory tools. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has also launched a number of environmental quality monitoring systems under the “right-to-know” rubric. EPA should continue to refine TRI through an accelerated program to periodically add or delete listed toxic pollutants based on the best currently available science.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.