Abstract

Junctions: Graduate Journal of the Humanities is an interdisciplinary, peer reviewed and open access journal in the Humanities. The journal aims to connect the different disciplines of the Humanities by collecting disciplinary and interdisciplinary texts so that they are accessible to readers from across the Humanities. Junctions provides scholars at the start of their academic careers with the opportunity to disseminate their research to a diverse audience of peers and professionals, as well as providing graduate students with relevant practical experience of organizing and maintaining a peer-reviewed open access journal. Through a rigorous double blind peer review process, the journal seeks to maintain the highest academic standards possible. Check out our new promo video here.

Highlights

  • In recent decades, citizenship theory has seen fierce debates between statist republicans and cosmopolitans

  • Statist republicans hold that citizenship can only exist at the national level, when it has a direct connection with popular sovereignty

  • Statist cosmopolitanism may be a reasonably convincing suggestion, it essentially leaves the citizenship at the national level

Read more

Summary

CITIZENSHIP AND STATISM

The statist republican position finds its origins in the Athenian polis and the writings of Aristotle (Pocock 1992, 32). Formal citizenship can be a great equalizer, but, as David Miller emphasizes, all depends on the degree to which informal and formal inclusion coincide: Equal citizenship means that every adult member of the political community must enjoy equal rights and responsibilities which together make up the single status of citizen. This is a one-class status – when we talk about people as second-class citizens, we do so in order to draw attention to the fact that something has gone wrong, that our institutions are not performing in the way that they should: no one can legitimately be a second-class citizen (Miller 2008, 375). It is against this – sometimes only implied – narrative that cosmopolitans have launched their main criticisms

COSMOPOLITAN CRITIQUES AND PROPOSALS
THREE EXAMPLES OF INFORMAL GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.