Abstract
The deliberate employment of defiance-based paradoxical directives in psychotherapy has frequently been related to benefits derivable from accepting and utilizing client resistance toward change. The social-psychological concept of reactance, based on the need for autonomy with the consequent tendency to resist another person's directives, is here postulated as the best explanation for this resistance. The present experiment attempts, analogously, to investigate certain hypotheses about reactance arousal in a paradoxical intervention. Participating in this study were 148 undergraduates, 72 male and 76 female. These students were confronted with an anxiety-laden situation involving an extremely tempting opportunity to cheat. Asked to assume they had succumbed to this temptation, they were instructed to decide among nine alternatives for dealing with their potentially hazardous behavior and then asked to redecide after exposure to a strongly authoritative (i.e., reactance-arousing) recommendation, presented...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
