Influences of preceding cover crops on slug damage and biological control using Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita

Abstract

SummaryIn a replicated field experiment, ryegrass, vetch and red clover were grown or the soil was kept bare over a 2–month period in summer to compare the effects of these treatments on slug damage to the following crop (Chinese cabbage) and on the efficacy of nematodes (Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita) applied as biological control agents to the soil at planting time to protect this crop. Slug damage was significantly (c. two times) greater after red clover or vetch than after ryegrass. Damage on plots without cover crop was intermediate and not significantly different from either extreme. Slug damage was reduced by about one‐third by the nematode treatment. The preceding cover crop did not influence nematode efficacy. Numbers of slugs on harvested plants (mainly Deroceras reticulatum and Deroceras panormitanum) were influenced by an interaction between cover crop and nematode treatment. On subplots without nematodes, more slugs were recorded with than without a preceding cover crop. No such differences were found on nematode‐treated subplots. Soil samples were collected at intervals from 0–99 days after nematode treatment to monitor nematode survival and infectivity in bioassays with D. reticulatum. No significant effects of cover crops were detected in bioassays. Moreover, there were no significant effects of nematodes on slug survival. Their effects on slug food consumption were mostly insignificant and any effects were transient and not consistent. However, significantly more slug cadavers contained nematodes when slugs were exposed to nematode‐treated soil. The implications of these results are discussed.