Abstract

The goal of this study is to compare patient-reported quality of life (PRQOL) evolution between two groups of end-stage renal disease patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). The first with a cinacalcet prescription within 3 months after a diagnosis of SHPT (early group) and a second group of patients with a later or no cinacalcet prescription (nonearly group). From 2009 to 2012, we conducted a multicenter pharmaco-epidemiologic study in Lorraine region (France) including all consecutive patients on maintenance dialysis for at least 3 months with a diagnosis of SHPT (PTH > 500 pg/ml or first cinacalcet prescription). PRQOL was estimated using the Kidney Disease Quality Of Life-Short Form questionnaire, at baseline and at 6 and 12 months follow-up. Change in PRQOL was compared between the groups and adjusted with a propensity score. We included 124 patients: 44 in the early group and 80 in the nonearly group. The mental component summary score was lower in the early group, at baseline (43.6 ± 6.6 vs 46.6 ± 7.6; p = 0.030), and at the follow-up assessment (42.6 ± 6.9 vs 45.7 ± 7.9; p = 0.033). We found no difference between the groups in change in PRQOL, for all dimensions, even after adjustment with the propensity score. Mean serum alkaline phosphatase levels were normal in both groups at baseline (80.9 ± 32.5 vs 95.1 ± 39.6; p = 0.41). Cinacalcet prescription immediately following diagnosis of SHPT does not seem to be associated with better PRQOL evolution at 1 year. Mean serum alkaline phosphatase levels suggest that physicians should consider waiting for another PTH assay result before starting cinacalcet in case of a PTH rise.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.