Influence of yttria content and surface treatment on the strength of translucent zirconia materials

Abstract

Statement of problemNewly developed translucent zirconia materials have been used for anterior monolithic complete coverage restorations. Surface treatments can improve adhesion, as well as decrease or increase the strength of ceramics. However, information on the influence of surface treatments on the strength of translucent zirconias is sparse. PurposeThe purpose of this in vitro study was to measure and characterize the effects of different surface treatments, including airborne-particle abrasion, on the strength of different translucent 4 mol% and 5 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia materials. Materials and methodsDisks (N=160) made from 4 types of translucent yttria-stabilized zirconia materials were surface-treated in 4 ways: Control groups were hand-polished with 2000-grit silicon carbide abrasive paper; as-machined; glass bead airborne-particle abraded; and alumina airborne-particle abraded. The biaxial flexural strength was measured by using a piston-on-3-ball test in a universal testing machine. The simple main effects of material type and surface treatment and their interaction on biaxial flexural strength were evaluated with 2-way ANOVA (α=.05). A priori, 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey multiple comparisons tests were used within material and treatment types (α=.05). Surface morphology was assessed by using scanning electron microscopy. Translucency, absolute transmittance, was measured by using a spectrophotometer. ResultsTwo-way ANOVA revealed that the effects of zirconia type, surface treatment, and their interaction all significantly affected biaxial flexural strength (P<.001). One-way ANOVA revealed that the 4Y material was stronger than all 5Y materials, regardless of surface treatment; all 5Y materials were ranked from strongest to weakest as polished; as-machined, or glass bead abraded; and alumina abraded. The 4Y material was stronger when alumina abraded than when glass bead abraded. Scanning electron microscopy showed that as-polished surfaces were smoother than all others; as-machined and glass bead abraded surfaces displayed little difference; alumina abraded was the roughest; and differences among materials were not discerned. The 1-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons testing showed that the 4Y material had less absolute transmittance, approximately 5% less, than all the 5Y materials. ConclusionsZirconia material type and surface treatment influenced the strength of translucent zirconia materials; a 4 mol% zirconia material was stronger than 5 mol% zirconia materials for all surface treatments tested; airborne-particle abrasion using alumina had a slight strengthening effect on a 4 mol% zirconia but had a weakening effect on 5 mol% materials; airborne-particle abrasion by using alumina produced the roughest surfaces on all materials; and the 4 mol% material was slightly less translucent than the 5 mol% materials.