Abstract

When abundant, seeds of the high-elevation whitebark pine (WBP; Pinus albicaulis) are an important fall food for grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Rates of bear mortality and bear/human conflicts have been inversely associated with WBP productivity. Recently, mountain pine beetles (Dendroctonus ponderosae) have killed many cone-producing WBP trees. We used fall (15 August–30 September) Global Positioning System locations from 89 bear years to investigate temporal changes in habitat use and movements during 2000–2011. We calculated Manly–Chesson (MC) indices for selectivity of WBP habitat and secure habitat (≥500 m from roads and human developments), determined dates of WBP use, and documented net daily movement distances and activity radii. To evaluate temporal trends, we used regression, model selection, and candidate model sets consisting of annual WBP production, sex, and year. One-third of sampled grizzly bears had fall ranges with little or no mapped WBP habitat. Most other bears (72%) had a MC index above 0.5, indicating selection for WBP habitats. From 2000 to 2011, mean MC index decreased and median date of WBP use shifted about 1 week later. We detected no trends in movement indices over time. Outside of national parks, there was no correlation between the MC indices for WBP habitat and secure habitat, and most bears (78%) selected for secure habitat. Nonetheless, mean MC index for secure habitat decreased over the study period during years of good WBP productivity. The wide diet breadth and foraging plasticity of grizzly bears likely allowed them to adjust to declining WBP. Bears reduced use of WBP stands without increasing movement rates, suggesting they obtained alternative fall foods within their local surroundings. However, the reduction in mortality risk historically associated with use of secure, high-elevation WBP habitat may be diminishing for bears residing in multiple-use areas.

Highlights

  • Shifts in species distribution toward higher elevations are among various biological consequences of climate change (Parmesan 2006)

  • Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

  • Weights applied to bears to account for fix success were 0.87–1.0 for use of whitebark pine (WBP) habitats and 0.91–1.0 for the use of secure habitat

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Shifts in species distribution toward higher elevations are among various biological consequences of climate change (Parmesan 2006). Species can vary in their sensitivity to increasing temperatures and their rate of shift, climate change can cause alterations in community composition and species interactions (Van der Putten 2012). Much work has focused on patterns of range shifts, less work has been done on the consequences of altered species interactions (Van der Putten 2012). This article is a U.S Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call