Abstract
Abstract Introduction: The triple negative(TN) breast cancer subtype (ER neg, PR neg, HER 2 neg) represents about 10 to 15% 0f all breast cancer types. It characterizes an aggressive phenotype with significantly worsened RFS, OS as well as specific clinical and pathological properties. The aim of this study was: 1.To assess the efficacy of guideline conforming conventional chemotherapy, local recurrence rate, distant recurrence rate, as well as overall survival. 2.To ask for subgroups that show the greatest benefit from conventional chemotherapy and 3. to ask for impact of guidelines violation on RFS and OA.Patients and methods: 3658 breast cancer Patients that were first diagnosed between the years 2000 and 2005 were analyzed in a multicentric retrospective study. A total of 371 (10,1%) were triple negative. Results: Median age was 62 years(26-101) TN: 60years.(28-97). 13,8% of all included patients are triple negative. 90,3% of all TN patients are at intermediate/high risk according to Nottingham risk classification. 76,5 have G3 tumors. The 5 year DFS is 74,8% (95%CI 68,8% - 80,8%) and for none TN 86,5%(95%CI 84,6% - 88,4%) (logrankp<0,0001). The 5 year OS is 75,8%(95%CI:69,9%- 81,8%) and for none TN 86%(95%CI:84,1%-87,9%). (logrank p < 0,0001). The essential parameters for RFS and OS were guidelines conforming surgery and radiation therapy, when chemotherapy conforming to guidelines was provided. The 5 year RFS for TN patients undergoing a 100% guideline according adjuvant therapy is 86.1%(95%CI:78.9%-93.4%), with 1-2 violations 76.0% (95%CI:69.0%-83.1%) and with ≥3 violations 50.6%(95%CI:20.1%-81.1%) (logrank p<0.0001). In total a 66,8% of all TN patients were not treated according to guidelines (ranking of violations: Chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery). 18% had 2 or more violations. Summary: The Results show a significant improvement of outcomes in TN breast cancer patients when treatment is conducted in accordance to guidelines. There are subgroups of TN breast cancer patients that profit from therapy according to guidelines. The leading guideline violation was noted for radiation therapy. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 2101.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
