Influence of the methodological aspects of the dichotomization of total metabolic tumor volume measured through baseline fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET on survival prediction in lymphoma.

Abstract

The total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) measured from fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET can be useful for determining the prognosis of patients with lymphoma. Stratifying patients into high- and low-TMTV risk groups requires a cutoff point, which is determined through the dichotomization method. This study investigated whether different TMTV dichotomization methods influenced survival prediction in patients with lymphoma. We retrospectively enrolled 129 patients with lymphoma who had undergone baseline 18F-FDG PET. TMTV was calculated using a fixed standardized uptake value threshold of 4.0. A total of six methods were employed to determine the optimal TMTV cutoff point using receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses, X-Tile bioinformatics software, and the Cutoff Finder web application. The prognostic performance of each method in survival prediction was examined. The median (interquartile range) TMTV was 123 cm3 (21-335 cm3). The optimal TMTV cutoff values for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were in the range of 144-748 cm3. The cutoff points were used to dichotomize patients into two groups with distinct prognoses. All TMTV dichotomizations were significantly predictive of PFS and OS. The survival curves showed significant differences between the high- and low-TMTV groups. The C-indices of the survival models did not significantly differ in any of the dichotomizations. The prognostic significance of TMTV was maintained regardless of the methodological aspects of dichotomization. However, the optimal TMTV cutoff point varied according to the chosen dichotomization method. Care should be taken when establishing an optimal TMTV cutoff point for clinical use.