Abstract

Previous studies have shown that current movement is influenced by the previous movement, which is known as the previous trial effect. In this study, we investigated the influence of the inter-trial interval, movement observation, and hand dominance on the previous trial effect of the non-target discrete movement. Right-handed healthy humans abducted the index finger in response to a start cue, and this task was repeated with constant inter-trial intervals. The absolute difference in the reaction time (RT) between the previous and current trials increased as the inter-trial interval increased. The absolute difference in RT reflects the reproducibility of the time taken for the motor execution between two consecutive trials. Thus, the finding supported the view that there is a carryover of movement information from one trial to the next, and that the underlying reproducibility of the RT between the two consecutive trials decays over time. This carryover of movement information is presumably conveyed by implicit short-term memory, which also decays within a short period of time. The correlation coefficient of the RT between the previous and current trials decreased with an increase in the inter-trial interval, indicating that the common responsiveness of two consecutive trials weakens over time. The absolute difference was smaller when the response was performed while observing finger movement, indicating that a carryover of the visual information to the next trial enhances the reproducibility of the motor execution process between consecutive trials. Hand dominance did not influence the absolute difference or correlation coefficient, indicating that the central process mediating previous trial effect of hand movement is not greatly lateralized.

Highlights

  • The previous movement influences the movement, called the previous trial effect (Fecteau and Munoz, 2003)

  • The mean reaction time (RT) increased along with inter-trial interval and the inter-trial interval had a significant effect on the mean RT (F (2, 24) = 22.658, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.654; Figure 2A)

  • The absolute difference (AD) in the RT between the previous and current trials increased with longer inter-trial intervals, indicating that the carryover of movement information from one trial to the decayed over time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The previous movement influences the movement, called the previous trial effect (Fecteau and Munoz, 2003). This effect has been well investigated in saccadic eye movement and has been reported even for limb movements. Strideto-stride variation of the walking speed is over-corrected in each stride (Dingwell et al, 2010; Dingwell and Cusumano, 2015). This indicates that current motor output is corrected based on the previous motor output even during rhythmic locomotor movement

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call