Abstract

PurposeTo compare four different secondary IOL fixation techniques regarding the least required force to dislocate a scleral fixated 3-piece IOL in human corneoscleral donor tissue (CST). DesignExperimental Laboratory investigation MethodsThe least required dislocation force (LRDF) of four different secondary IOL fixation techniques, namely the techniques using transscleral tunnels (TT, as described by Scharioth), glued haptics (GH, Argawa), flanged haptics (FH, Yamane) and bent haptic ends (BH, Behera/Bolz) were investigated using 40 three-piece IOLs (Sensar AR40) fixated to human scleral tissue. The main outcome of the study, dislocation force between different techniques, was measured with a tensiometer. ResultsThe dislocation force needed to dislocate the haptics was highest with the FH technique and was significantly higher than with all the other techniques (GH vs FH: -1.02±0.02 N, p<0.001; TT vs FH: -1.08±0.21 N, p<0.001; BH vs FH: -1.00±0.25 N, p=0.044). There was no significant difference regarding the dislocation force between the other techniques (GH vs TT (-0.06±0.100 N, p=0.988), GH vs BH (-0.02±0.03 N, p=0.60), TT vs BH (-0.08±0.04 N, p=1.000). ConclusionsThe flange haptic technique as described by Yamane proved to be the strongest form of secondary IOL fixation regarding dislocation force in this in vitro study. The other fixation techniques showed significantly less resistance to axial traction.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.