Abstract

The influence of electrolyte pH on the sensitization efficiency of porphyrin-derivatized TiO2 was studied by photoelectrochemical and transient absorption measurements. The porphyrins 5-(4-carboxyphenyl)-10,15,20-trimesitylporphinatozinc(II) (1), 5-(4-carboxyphenyl)-10,15,20-trimesitylporphine (2), 5-(4-carboxyphenyl)-10,15,20-trimesitylporphinatoplatinum(II) (3), and 5-(4-dihydroxyphosphorylphenyl)-10,15,20-trimesitylporphinatozinc(II) (4) were anchored to low-surface-area and nanocrystalline TiO2 films. The TiO2 conduction band edge potential (ECB) shifted 59 ± 2 mV/pH, from −0.43 V vs Ag/AgCl(aq) at pH 12 to +0.16 V vs Ag/AgCl(aq) at pH 2. Excited-state potentials (E1/2(P+/*)) of 1−4 ranged from −1.58 to −0.91 V vs Ag/AgCl(aq), well negative of ECB. Despite the thermodynamic favorability of electron injection, a 10-fold increase in sensitized photocurrent was measured for 1−4 upon acidification of the electrolyte from pH 10 to 4. Transient absorption data revealed that sensitization of nanocrystalline TiO2 by 1−4 depended on pH in an identical manner. A mechanism is proposed wherein protonation of a surface site is required for charge compensation of injected electrons. Thus, the magnitude of sensitized photocurrent is determined by surface protonation-deprotonation equilibria.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.