Abstract
Retinal degenerative diseases are a major cause of blindness involving the dysfunction of photoreceptors, retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE), or both. A promising treatment approach involves replacing these cells via surgical transplantation, and previous work has shown that cell delivery scaffolds are vital to ensure sufficient cell survival. Thus, identifying scaffold properties that are conducive to cell viability and maturation (such as suitable material and mechanical properties) is critical to ensuring a successful treatment approach. In this study, we investigated the effect of scaffold stiffness on human RPE attachment, survival, and differentiation, comparing immortalized (ARPE-19) and stem cell-derived RPE (iRPE) cells. Polydimethylsiloxane was used as a model polymer substrate, and varying stiffness (~12 to 800 kPa) was achieved by modulating the cross-link-to-base ratio. Post-attachment changes in gene and protein expression were assessed using qPCR and immunocytochemistry. We found that while ARPE-19 and iRPE exhibited significant differences in morphology and expression of RPE markers, substrate stiffness did not have a substantial impact on cell growth or maturation for either cell type. These results highlight the differences in expression between immortalized and iPSC-derived RPE cells, and also suggest that stiffnesses in this range (~12-800 kPa) may not result in significant differences in RPE growth and maturation, an important consideration in scaffold design.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.